[multimob] Polling WG on draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Thu, 09 January 2014 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672C11AE049 for <multimob@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:12:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iQJIaZQ3kuJ2 for <multimob@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:12:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCE61AE02E for <multimob@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id eh20so334428lab.20 for <multimob@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 12:12:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zZ60zUXLpDA3CO5LjaR5kozHcidAkF9/DBAB8dM8/tc=; b=d1XRg/N8LJ3s8KHoEZ+CL3PHeRsvkxB0tNEKertj6U5i04qM5F3VaYUpKM4vvvrKaH 6VZ6xeTl3Y2iZP9gnK50KiXREF9XrUZIG9BVZDXJamW+laVQ5KnWqRSCGsTDj0XmPAfE 70p1c/PV5jN12idtKliiwQG/NOyozy4zri4rOKz/bfZrAxIBHmrpGwsiKft7SG6mqa4r juuob7IvL9bgqs5BqnSbaGRkgHaFprEIXcHagCyJo86KBEPCwXQXUuEzrxytZdtD5OXL tzE+6d0al7GHIUD46wLdHEkRKtX5QksS2beSAO+tUxTWmYqI62nsP4BApfiIjpqLhda0 NjiQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.184.169 with SMTP id ev9mr2049466lbc.25.1389298348492; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 12:12:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.170.193 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:12:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 14:12:28 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcdYk0dioXh7x3_Offq+2Ykg2OhS70Nw9j3TcdHjGg_v+A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: "multimob@ietf.org" <multimob@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3bfa88c899c04ef8f3a5c"
Subject: [multimob] Polling WG on draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07
X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: Multicast Mobility <multimob.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multimob/>
List-Post: <mailto:multimob@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 20:12:40 -0000

Hi all,

Before shepherding this document to IESG we would like to get consensus
opinion on one issue regarding this document that came up recently. Please
refer to my conversation with Thomas on the list.

ISSUE:
Multimob WG has not worked on PIM at MAG for receiver mobility, we only
worked on Proxy at MAG as per RFC 6224.
However draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07 covers PIM at MAG for source
mobility starting with Section 4.3.

Question:

Do you support covering PIM at MAG for source mobility, then say YES,

if you do not support it then say NO.

We need as many people as possible to express opinion on this issue. The
deadline is one week from today, January 16, 2014.

If WG consensus does not exist, we will ask the authors to remove PIM at
MAG sections (subsections) and we will submit the revised document to IESG.

Regards,

Behcet