Re: [multimob] Polling WG on draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07

Hi,

I do not think that IETF procedures allow for WG chairs to garble drafts 
after they had successfully passed WG last call.

Am I mistaken, Brian?

Cheers,

Thomas

On 09.01.2014 21:12, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Before shepherding this document to IESG we would like to get consensus
> opinion on one issue regarding this document that came up recently.
> Please refer to my conversation with Thomas on the list.
>
> ISSUE:
> Multimob WG has not worked on PIM at MAG for receiver mobility, we only
> worked on Proxy at MAG as per RFC 6224.
> However draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07 covers PIM at MAG for
> source mobility starting with Section 4.3.
>
> Question:
>
> Do you support covering PIM at MAG for source mobility, then say YES,
>
> if you do not support it then say NO.
>
> We need as many people as possible to express opinion on this issue. The
> deadline is one week from today, January 16, 2014.
>
> If WG consensus does not exist, we will ask the authors to remove PIM at
> MAG sections (subsections) and we will submit the revised document to IESG.
>
> Regards,
>
> Behcet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> multimob mailing list
> multimob@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob
>

-- 

Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences                   Berliner Tor 7 °
° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group    20099 Hamburg, Germany °
° http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet                   Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 °
° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt    Fax: +49-40-42875-8409 °