Re: [multimob] Polling WG on draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07

[Brian Haberman <[e-mail]>]

Thomas,
     You are not mistaken.  The WG chairs are responsible for
determining if there is consensus in the WG to advance a draft for
publication.  If an issue was raised about the content of the document,
it should be discussed on the mailing list.

Regards,
Brian


On 1/9/14 3:35 PM, Thomas C. Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I do not think that IETF procedures allow for WG chairs to garble drafts
> after they had successfully passed WG last call.
> 
> Am I mistaken, Brian?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Thomas
> 
> On 09.01.2014 21:12, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Before shepherding this document to IESG we would like to get consensus
>> opinion on one issue regarding this document that came up recently.
>> Please refer to my conversation with Thomas on the list.
>>
>> ISSUE:
>> Multimob WG has not worked on PIM at MAG for receiver mobility, we only
>> worked on Proxy at MAG as per RFC 6224.
>> However draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-07 covers PIM at MAG for
>> source mobility starting with Section 4.3.
>>
>> Question:
>>
>> Do you support covering PIM at MAG for source mobility, then say YES,
>>
>> if you do not support it then say NO.
>>
>> We need as many people as possible to express opinion on this issue. The
>> deadline is one week from today, January 16, 2014.
>>
>> If WG consensus does not exist, we will ask the authors to remove PIM at
>> MAG sections (subsections) and we will submit the revised document to
>> IESG.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Behcet
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> multimob mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob
>>
>