IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Summary WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-ecdsa

Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com> Thu, 19 January 2012 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3440B21F84C2; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:42:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1326998544; bh=I/uooTDLS3FJryQbxXX9/9KDHWjkN5eQW4LSFhmVnOY=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=QOpttwdg0e0TZwztRgIstMCyQnkXbSRhT7v0gJ5Er7JO/QYhYbQ5CnvIA1a2ltbRL mmh25H9VG5vmQCuSh6QoL5SVclu+tAkjYsOlHzH7jxAkqWFP29CsEYZ6Fyqfjwl+Ei NgGW1YCNBqvNQJhFct3swAsEh9Lr51Jx66KeWUVw=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3353521F85E7 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:42:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qk11f03jKaMG for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:42:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6601921F847C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:42:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yenm3 with SMTP id m3so182203yen.31 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:42:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AgUDq7g5oKZPJpRge/m67P0QaApWDpxJzzZmqzBtDqk=; b=sf6VZlaCQIjhKWCX6o+f0zDSexSSdmE01X+3+r0Ywly8Yz0InvZJqTzan4b9qzSh2P 97sxYxTEpkg7P8iKein3dWBVQdQhEv3XR5mK/kbRIlqeGTevNyeBSqFR3Mz+rixdt9EP SaGVApuD2L7No22WPxTQjonmprn0hAY4kYBFk=
Received: by 10.236.141.37 with SMTP id f25mr41979321yhj.3.1326998540068; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:42:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.13.151] ([12.52.73.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r68sm366984yhm.18.2012.01.19.10.42.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:42:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F186400.8010604@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:42:08 -0500
From: Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
References: <4F185979.1060105@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F185979.1060105@ogud.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Summary WGLC: draft-ietf-dnsext-ecdsa
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Olafur:

I may have missed this, but I never saw an announcement for WG last call.

More importantly, though, the last versions do not really seem to have
addressed my comments sent prior to the July 2011 meeting in Quebec.

Rene


On 19/01/2012 12:57 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> This working group last call has completed, during the last call we
> had enough support and reviews to meet the WG requirements.
>
> During the last call a few suggestions about how to improve the text
> were made, the editors have applied these to the latest version.
> During the last call a suggestion was made to optimize the binary
> formats, that proposal did not receive any support.
>
> I will be submitting this document in the next few days to the IESG.
>
>     Olafur
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> dnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext


-- 
email: rstruik.ext@gmail.com
Skype: rstruik
cell: +1 (647) 867-5658
USA Google voice: +1 (415) 690-7363

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email