IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 10 February 2012 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CEE21F8759; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:25:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1328891109; bh=HaK/JnfKXY3M8sKDEzkN49GMe8+MS0pW1UAHBNuWJek=; h=Mime-Version:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-Id:References:To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=lti9N9wfBbMk13IiBDgP8T1jdpHNWn3Qdet2/4U+upRc/JBCgsnTynmQkJxIWxbi3 BPNdqwSSReaFn81s/UywbkjyxAobmh1hDe7b7G2Kmni2WLLYr2ifOh/ux3rUWCCOJ/ MwBXVsEb51SnUKVpmY59kQGkdcNUj/FtE8JdcesQ=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52C921F8767 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:25:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JuML4iQodAbm for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:25:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3326F21F8759 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:25:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.100] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q1AGP5FN048566 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:25:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F33E1A6.4030902@isc.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:25:05 -0800
Message-Id: <D986E2FF-8EEF-4382-B401-8F6AD371579E@vpnc.org>
References: <4F33E1A6.4030902@isc.org>
To: paul vixie <vixie@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

This does not seem like it is a quick fix that can be done in the next few weeks.

Why is there hesitation on making this an individual submission for standards track that would happen after the WG shuts down?

--Paul Hoffman

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email