IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"

Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> Fri, 10 February 2012 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087A921F86DE; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:27:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1328902062; bh=YTXJg16fvfdtrd3Ska48lDCi4LHIbux9K2ryc2jIU5Y=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:References:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=QQ6BJJwKj7A1vRkvTQI+HVy68b8IBgNLKGNqV7qPYbU4W6z2lnbaBGrFRIBzg9SaL yHDMEjlQORmsITuldnF2ftY8ZA57XkFwXBNHHeMHstZsD/2M0BysccIjEzyPUJuy2K CGar0DxwDhUkxJNTNUMUVKJ+CZHC9lKGs8M3JrwU=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2886921F86DE for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:27:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nYHoMzDPYYKq for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:27:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD79621F86D8 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:27:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bikeshed.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23320C9427; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:27:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from each@isc.org)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id D501A216C6E; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:27:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:27:28 +0000
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
To: Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <20120210192728.GC90680@isc.org>
References: <3699_1328861785_4F34D258_3699_2027_1_4F33E1A6.4030902@isc.org> <20120210084439.GB7284@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <4F34E0BF.9060305@nlnetlabs.nl> <4F353676.6090702@ogud.com> <161E2DAB-4355-4ED8-826A-6C5A0F74CE52@icsi.berkeley.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <161E2DAB-4355-4ED8-826A-6C5A0F74CE52@icsi.berkeley.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] perhaps we should reintroduce "resimprove"
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

> One other option: replace-with-min-TTL:  A replacement cache entry's new
> TTL is min(current TTL on the entry, new TTL).

This is the approach we're taking in BIND 9, at present.

-- 
Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email