Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-05 (was: DNSEXT closing down soon)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Wed, 11 January 2012 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC0221F85E4; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:14:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1326312847; bh=Jnl1Xg8XvUiDFgjnZyaKuU4KDwFgryLHacrkygSuPW8=; h=From:To:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=aOkakbvY/wRUAf3LtvekCGYF8KYuL/kli+sL9Oqwd30G3BhJTe4TAG2MwO1s1QDsn 6+I8fZ79alRelkJ3bLr25ntJc9zb2hrPccST3rPLWiEJhz8Yc2Gzf4DN2kMM9LRyut x0bGwbtapczHodEMZtpi+6T2o0SV55xuC5fpF/ls=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E884F21F85E4 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:14:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.577
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L6RJA+u+3GcB for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:14:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2D921F84AA for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:14:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spite.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.72) by EXCH-HTCAS901.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:13:58 -0800
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:14:05 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:14:04 -0800
Thread-Topic: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-05 (was: DNSEXT closing down soon)
Thread-Index: AczQfRPZICPsOCveSwef9uMrKqNMfAAIBHdQ
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C1580D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4ED94590.3090902@ogud.com> <CAF4+nEGmCQCFhGzMDw0ERS+8Kb2ftAbNeBvVwdd228gLa1NdDA@mail.gmail.com> <20120110145640.GC6201@crankycanuck.ca> <6BC842FB-FC81-4B1A-8EFF-735314D77141@hopcount.ca> <20120111162112.GD1334@mail.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20120111162112.GD1334@mail.yitter.info>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-05 (was: DNSEXT closing down soon)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dnsext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:21 AM
> To: dnsext@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-05 (was: DNSEXT closing down soon)
> 
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:01:19PM -0800, Joe Abley wrote:
> > I have just reviewed this document, and I support it advancing for
> > publication as-is.
> >
> > Does that help?
> 
> I see no reason to be bureaucratic and hide-bound: sure it helps.
> I'll start on the write up.

I've read it and I support its publication as well.  I have some edits to propose, which I can contribute as part of a formal AppsDir review if you like since they are not major.

Are you planning to make this a WG document or send it through under its current name?

-MSK
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext