IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf review

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Mon, 28 May 2018 06:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B55126C19 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 May 2018 23:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9mYa-xlJTwCA for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 May 2018 23:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F54412D7FC for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 May 2018 23:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (h-80-27.A165.priv.bahnhof.se [212.85.80.27]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8AB51AE034E; Mon, 28 May 2018 08:31:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 08:31:38 +0200
Message-Id: <20180528.083138.2180231778253133034.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: mjethanandani@gmail.com
Cc: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, netconf@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <819F441B-A756-4FC9-9FE0-7AF00E76113F@gmail.com>
References: <BA34DEED-D6AD-4D16-83CE-1B4B48276EB1@gmail.com> <20180515113036.lud5x24s5rt3s2qw@elstar.local> <819F441B-A756-4FC9-9FE0-7AF00E76113F@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/8Nl6J7ajCyA3TrpUBhHLPiLzO8Q>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf review
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 06:31:43 -0000

Hi,

Version -06 is now posted.  It addresses the warning re the "enum"
statement.


/martin

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let me take this up in a separate thread that is not tied to this review.
> 
> In the meantime, can we address the pyang error.
> 
> > On May 15, 2018, at 1:30 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 01:14:12PM +0200, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> On May 15, 2018, at 11:42 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:36:16AM +0200, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> 2. This is a follow-up to the discussion on the mailing list. Reading through this draft, RFC7950, RFC6020, and rfc7895bis, it is not clear if a NETCONF server that wants to support both YANG 1.0 and YANG 1.1, needs to do from a schema advertisement perspective. Does it advertise the schemas as part of <hello> and as part of yang-library:1.1? Does it advertise both YANG 1.0 and 1.1 models in both the modes?
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> How does this relate to NMDA?
> >> 
> >> If we agree this needs to be clarified, we can decide next where to put the clarification.
> >> 
> > 
> > Well you raised this in a thread concerning nmda-netconf. We currently
> > have this:
> > 
> >   An NMDA-compliant NETCONF server MUST support the operational state
> >   datastore and it MUST implement at least revision 201X-XX-XX of the
> >   "ietf-yang-library" module defined in [I-D.ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis].
> > 
> > So for NMDA, implementations have to use "ietf-yang-library".
> > 
> > So what are the proposed edits that relate to NMDA?
> > 
> > /js
> > 
> > -- 
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> > Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> > Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> 
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> mjethanandani@gmail.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email