Re: [netconf] ietf crypto types - permanently hidden

tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Fri, 05 April 2019 10:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D77D1203BD for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 03:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RATWARE_MS_HASH=2.148, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jFb3E-il3fdW for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 03:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr130135.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.13.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D78021200F5 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 03:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-btconnect-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ukeQeD1/uDHWjaUmTMPnJMYE9UtF7EcPYldCIXgPSlU=; b=We0nbr8bj7C3dFL/EbHZf1gDnWVo+VOADMk2ta+bOgkZKkYdiVKECQNWmhhFn5FmatFBHSly0iI0shbTK2x6VKKzy+90c07Q7GwdkKre2a1x0zOqJHW2ABcvaFKZ2CednjPMlR8+0QaaiVyk9M9aqP3y47llqlxmEcnHauFi0VQ=
Received: from DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.46.212) by DB7PR07MB4666.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.135.141.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1771.12; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 10:48:36 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::89bf:8194:3f8c:ff65]) by DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::89bf:8194:3f8c:ff65%5]) with mapi id 15.20.1771.007; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 10:48:36 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de" <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netconf] ietf crypto types - permanently hidden
Thread-Index: AQHU650f9g7iAuRhP0CzDwIXBf2MNg==
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 10:48:36 +0000
Message-ID: <01dd01d4eb9c$b9a04160$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <20190403.134424.1377386644961079970.mbj@tail-f.com> <01000169e929781e-b0dcb6b3-af41-4f9c-ba52-ac4afb7164d4-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20190404164929.fsfga7s4izn7ucx5@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <20190404.194623.1178346313710501110.mbj@tail-f.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: LO2P265CA0022.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:62::34) To DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:7b::20)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
x-originating-ip: [86.139.215.234]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 20125991-4783-4e22-c7ee-08d6b9b44188
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600139)(711020)(4605104)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DB7PR07MB4666;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR07MB4666:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB7PR07MB4666B4EDD26AA2CB7B642209A0510@DB7PR07MB4666.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0998671D02
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(366004)(136003)(346002)(376002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(71200400001)(6512007)(8936002)(8676002)(386003)(2501003)(1556002)(2906002)(256004)(14444005)(71190400001)(316002)(25786009)(966005)(14496001)(6306002)(4720700003)(5660300002)(68736007)(110136005)(3846002)(6116002)(478600001)(7736002)(66066001)(86152003)(14454004)(62236002)(50226002)(44716002)(4326008)(93886005)(84392002)(106356001)(105586002)(99286004)(229853002)(6486002)(52116002)(97736004)(305945005)(9686003)(81816011)(76176011)(81156014)(26005)(446003)(44736005)(476003)(81686011)(81166006)(86362001)(486006)(102836004)(61296003)(53936002)(6506007)(6436002)(6246003)(186003)(74416001)(7726001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB7PR07MB4666; H:DB7PR07MB5562.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: EFblu5gSAAbLwD+1d4WsLl+o+nUuoNqAZkfT5iQW7Irq2SNk+kBaDKlAf8izKuR2rn3OxGXS2kT3fcH71XnpCnHkUqnqKyuzEt1B/CnDrIQRovcU3tBr4KN4UxYOqZfDhZXMVhYAXzI9WlSC/Zw9pA6Y5YAoIUW+lkvZdTYnyN/m1H8L0wCh0ne93G3L84svUgBPOG8A484jsbs8g0dnfkWO0xNBRjGJyuPJ0w+C291B1QANpY2gOZV6ci5SJKir9+NuWXhbNm0lV9VM6hhTDgLMr7qPYDveCKrDHh9LGWTcAMtCekSaDE6CjKQXDAX15diHImOLXtdSZ7UIYDZuJVya7NDgaJUjT0Gh8F/gFSXsFDtpVlwkx2H0IWEBYS6t3bUAVGdyCJP7bcfihD1ksgBXaRzRRYwBTQM2umw3Bxo=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <131103EDA4C3C64D920DA9E8387C0CF2@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 20125991-4783-4e22-c7ee-08d6b9b44188
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Apr 2019 10:48:36.7120 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB4666
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/CK8zwK_KsnxRg2dWv6GcVeJMQ8I>
Subject: Re: [netconf] ietf crypto types - permanently hidden
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 10:48:42 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Bjorklund" <mbj@tail-f.com>
To: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Cc: <netconf@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2019 6:46 PM

> Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 04:23:23PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > We have always said no, but the reasoning is unclear.  What are
the
> > > specific objections and is there anyway to alleviate them?
> > >
> >
> > If editing of all configuration can be done with a single edit-data
> > (or edit-config) operation, you simplify the world and you enable
> > generic implementations.
> >
> > Once you build silos of data that can only be manipulated with
special
> > purpose operations, you say goodbye to the idea of generic client
> > libraries.
>
> And you can no longer create all required config in one transaction;
> you have to split it into sending multiple special-purpose actions.
> Perhaps also in a certain order, that you have to figure out somehow,
> since config might have refererences to other partf of the config
> etc.
>
> You can no longer restore a backup with just a copy-config.

Which is exactly what I have seen customers - think military - do.

Security-related information - userid, passwords, second factor , ...-
MUST NOT be backed up like everything else - special procedures -
authentication, encryption -  must be used.

This is security - it matters.

Tom Petch

> So I don't think the reasoning is unclear at all.
>
> /martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf