Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241 (4856)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 20 December 2016 11:37 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A401293E1 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:37:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yrJ1RYsh27vD for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:37:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2DFD128B44 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:37:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9126; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1482233876; x=1483443476; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=GJ0ZvLIolSLylmU2u6wrJT1ZwJzelnBcR/CH2olaT40=; b=ADtp5pgE+i2Su/wg4o8DxewOqqSWgUJo5GQEAZuN82N7tn7fZdTSqiqN qwinhsdhWzekMNS31QOllTl538qGLdkzcb/mkqdBeL/zRDs9oIgizUHuD TIcmQV7ugC3d24JKCRPAFZ1YDjfWOV9VMwIncqho8dV2O1BGW+FVa7hkl 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ABAQBBF1lY/xbLJq1DGhkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM3AQEBAQF5LliNUHOVZ49phSWCCiqFeAKCOhQBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRpAQEEEhFWEAkCGCcDAgJGEQYNBgIBAR6ISQ4ujCmPVQGNdoIoL4pnAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYY2gX2CXIE9gUaEQYJdBYhiEYdQhECFbZE0gXSFA4Mnhi+KNINlhA8fNzFSFQ4Wgzw7DQ+BXj00AROIXgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,378,1477958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="650873735"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2016 11:37:54 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.91] (ams-bclaise-89110.cisco.com [10.60.67.91]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uBKBbrah017679; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:37:53 GMT
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
References: <20161108093217.CC0C7B808C2@rfc-editor.org> <484cbbb6-e11d-9ad5-cfce-cfed667ceded@cisco.com> <CABCOCHRLritCXGW1cRgF2iE=xM_VmhTZUvZvcUbMYEf1g72j=Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <cdbde5eb-42af-0a29-e453-f52d5620eef3@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:37:53 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHRLritCXGW1cRgF2iE=xM_VmhTZUvZvcUbMYEf1g72j=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E5E4F20862868A7E9619050B"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/DlHb6toXO2nCYZjaSqn3OFhhFjY>
Cc: Rob Enns <rob.enns@gmail.com>, "Ersue, Mehmet (Nokia - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nokia.com>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241 (4856)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:37:59 -0000

OK, thanks Andy and Jürgen.

Regards, B.
> Hi,
>
> this should be rejected.
> The changed text implies that different configurations are present,
> each derived from some unspecified subset of modules.
> This is not correct.
>
>
> Andy
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:57 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com 
> <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     Please let me know what you think of this errata.
>
>     Regards, Benoit.
>
>         The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6241,
>         "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)".
>
>         --------------------------------------
>         You may review the report below and at:
>         http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6241&eid=4856
>         <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6241&eid=4856>
>
>         --------------------------------------
>         Type: Technical
>         Reported by: frank feng <frank.fengchong@huawei.com
>         <mailto:frank.fengchong@huawei.com>>
>
>         Section: 7.2
>
>         Original Text
>         -------------
>         config:  A hierarchy of configuration data as defined by one of
>                   the device's data models.  The contents MUST be
>         placed in an
>                   appropriate namespace, to allow the device to detect the
>                   appropriate data model, and the contents MUST follow the
>                   constraints of that data model, as defined by its
>         capability
>                   definition.  Capabilities are discussed in Section 8.
>
>         Corrected Text
>         --------------
>         config:  A hierarchy of configuration data as defined by one
>         or more of
>                   the device's data models.  The contents MUST be
>         placed in an
>                   appropriate namespace, to allow the device to detect the
>                   appropriate data model, and the contents MUST follow the
>                   constraints of that data model, as defined by its
>         capability
>                   definition.  Capabilities are discussed in Section 8.
>
>         Notes
>         -----
>
>
>         Instructions:
>         -------------
>         This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary,
>         please
>         use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>         rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>         can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
>         --------------------------------------
>         RFC6241 (draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-10)
>         --------------------------------------
>         Title               : Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)
>         Publication Date    : June 2011
>         Author(s)           : R. Enns, Ed., M. Bjorklund, Ed., J.
>         Schoenwaelder, Ed., A. Bierman, Ed.
>         Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>         Source              : Network Configuration
>         Area                : Operations and Management
>         Stream              : IETF
>         Verifying Party     : IESG
>         .
>
>
>