Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241 (4856)

MehmetErsue <mersue@gmail.com> Tue, 20 December 2016 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <mersue@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDCA129672 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:28:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sQn_AkwP1lMg for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x244.google.com (mail-qt0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32807129668 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x244.google.com with SMTP id l20so22614048qta.1 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:28:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=O3PDWPmjhPm2bVIdjTHKjkhBiYI1oDWrzE/lcSilt9Y=; b=R4FJYKJ7HL6uY3oHroBE/ekH48Du/kraDPAjg6wjIdIQjCbQhmhc6oY2e57lbQspuW FHh9cqb/PXMN8YgYnA0KZ5bj1i0X2E1vf+P0gPEG+h9WYaRHQkIdIVg800LvcbIfX2/g YC94hOWN/w70SoIt4L28O2LofZ5zuhKvVfrD8uL/wy4od2uaMP7CHvq77ClF9ip2fRs4 wI93v2jZeloMM78thD/T2TNIv3msYZG2xEuFd3jQrFrPJhGDBg/KltmylSUCFNZbwKbh bb5cw8vQoftD5Q5P10ScbH2QC9izZGWP/xlSJSoQqvFAzp4jTb/DAusLY2oDB+wnba2o rFWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O3PDWPmjhPm2bVIdjTHKjkhBiYI1oDWrzE/lcSilt9Y=; b=Y9XTQpPX5fd/2CpipMsHRBdR6t8QeSvrZduVcS5Y7TmL3NlWPO557M8Cs2TpGGjzsV LTXKynFPJvPszUdWdzOERfzxq4/CEPG8f1tG7ydugo+jl8YVQYWHhHvGWHcG0G/ekweX if3PDCxkrNRbrp4xUEl68zrBstA+p85xIKNNww9OefUpX/4THGfrRJCC1D7d0I8vhJ3U cJLiR0yWOUEOR1ztaDS6qD5Rk2/VE2w6d76fLjflYv2mFQ5wIw4C1GtRAjAgXWfn9U5e /gQT4YeppbAcXhYlSvt3Lfo9R1LlsCkwnWKZwlH5rXWu9pY07AHyGKyAUsvGR3go6uQ4 nulg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKG/FOoH7xaOLDI2GIP6mEVW+rslRIY/XSNXKBIR83pXrmxZf/83PrSTeExGDNSqWaWhH6H/lzMCsHOvA==
X-Received: by 10.200.41.248 with SMTP id 53mr21847969qtt.3.1482236893189; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:28:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20161108093217.CC0C7B808C2@rfc-editor.org> <484cbbb6-e11d-9ad5-cfce-cfed667ceded@cisco.com> <CABCOCHRLritCXGW1cRgF2iE=xM_VmhTZUvZvcUbMYEf1g72j=Q@mail.gmail.com> <cdbde5eb-42af-0a29-e453-f52d5620eef3@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <cdbde5eb-42af-0a29-e453-f52d5620eef3@cisco.com>
From: MehmetErsue <mersue@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:28:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGyj0qMSJQKYwOtCBy8iutqfFWbbtwFxZ+XNvZ46izEQ1rO9MQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114107847df34d0544162ba5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/kYWhDAQN0fXdZXyoEVipNWsCn6k>
Cc: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, "Ersue, Mehmet (Nokia - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nokia.com>, Rob Enns <rob.enns@gmail.com>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241 (4856)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:28:16 -0000

I kind of agree with Andy and Juergen.

Mehmet

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> schrieb am Di., 20. Dez. 2016, 12:38:

> OK, thanks Andy and Jürgen.
>
> Regards, B.
>
> Hi,
>
> this should be rejected.
> The changed text implies that different configurations are present,
> each derived from some unspecified subset of modules.
> This is not correct.
>
>
> Andy
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:57 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Please let me know what you think of this errata.
>
> Regards, Benoit.
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6241,
> "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6241&eid=4856
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: frank feng <frank.fengchong@huawei.com>
>
> Section: 7.2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> config:  A hierarchy of configuration data as defined by one of
>           the device's data models.  The contents MUST be placed in an
>           appropriate namespace, to allow the device to detect the
>           appropriate data model, and the contents MUST follow the
>           constraints of that data model, as defined by its capability
>           definition.  Capabilities are discussed in Section 8.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> config:  A hierarchy of configuration data as defined by one or more of
>           the device's data models.  The contents MUST be placed in an
>           appropriate namespace, to allow the device to detect the
>           appropriate data model, and the contents MUST follow the
>           constraints of that data model, as defined by its capability
>           definition.  Capabilities are discussed in Section 8.
>
> Notes
> -----
>
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6241 (draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-10)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)
> Publication Date    : June 2011
> Author(s)           : R. Enns, Ed., M. Bjorklund, Ed., J. Schoenwaelder,
> Ed., A. Bierman, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network Configuration
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> .
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>
-- 
Cheers,
Mehmet