Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241 (4856)
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 19 December 2016 10:58 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24767129884 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:58:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5pAV55klvFC for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:57:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1541296F4 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:57:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2278; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1482145079; x=1483354679; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M5KSzbGRQecJG/iNIrCjFb6Mp/PDq2AUCMz5hmOOkGU=; b=KApMf+slxq4w2V3FmVDwaQCDUL+ND+Xm+TuW5fB7FldauA40f/mc9H0s XDNpaNRa9beeVqaCQ8J5A6ywq9zyZXi+D5Jb57rX+KZsVlPPMdy8xJN26 4LnE2WaoKzSX7isxLSILepI4l1AjeqVIr84W/fwoVF9bRJBO2q48Tfs5Y 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D+AABVvFdY/xbLJq1DGhkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM3AQEBAQF5gQaNT3Oqc4IKKoV4AoJUFAECAQEBAQEBAWIohGkCBBImQRALRlcHDAYCAQEeiEkOLp4dAZAeiwsBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBASGGNoF9glyBPYFGhx4FiGIRh1CKLZE0gXSFA4Mnhi+KNId0HzeBAhUOFoNyDQ+BXj00AROISAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,373,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="690562731"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Dec 2016 10:57:57 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.91] (ams-bclaise-89110.cisco.com [10.60.67.91]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uBJAvvYm008493; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:57:57 GMT
To: rob.enns@gmail.com, mbj@tail-f.com, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, andy@yumaworks.com, joelja@bogus.com, mjethanandani@gmail.com, mehmet.ersue@nokia.com
References: <20161108093217.CC0C7B808C2@rfc-editor.org>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <484cbbb6-e11d-9ad5-cfce-cfed667ceded@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:57:57 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161108093217.CC0C7B808C2@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/zst3s9tYFtRFUqPBbXO04SzlAjw>
Cc: netconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241 (4856)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:58:02 -0000
Dear all, Please let me know what you think of this errata. Regards, Benoit. > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6241, > "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6241&eid=4856 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: frank feng <frank.fengchong@huawei.com> > > Section: 7.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > config: A hierarchy of configuration data as defined by one of > the device's data models. The contents MUST be placed in an > appropriate namespace, to allow the device to detect the > appropriate data model, and the contents MUST follow the > constraints of that data model, as defined by its capability > definition. Capabilities are discussed in Section 8. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > config: A hierarchy of configuration data as defined by one or more of > the device's data models. The contents MUST be placed in an > appropriate namespace, to allow the device to detect the > appropriate data model, and the contents MUST follow the > constraints of that data model, as defined by its capability > definition. Capabilities are discussed in Section 8. > > Notes > ----- > > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6241 (draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-10) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) > Publication Date : June 2011 > Author(s) : R. Enns, Ed., M. Bjorklund, Ed., J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., A. Bierman, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Network Configuration > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > . >
- [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241 (48… RFC Errata System
- Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241… Andy Bierman
- Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241… MehmetErsue