Re: [Netconf] Last Call on yang-push-17

Hi Mahesh,

I changed the text as requested.  I moved the first item on the list into parantheses as a note before the list.

-- Alex

From: Netconf [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mahesh Jethanandani
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 3:45 PM
To: netconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Last Call on yang-push-17

I have not reviewed the entire document, but have looked at the Security Considerations section.

The document follows the template defined in OPS-Dir wiki here<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines>, but there is a reference in the template that needs to be updated.

s/NETCONF access control model/Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM)/

Also, can the list of subtrees and data nodes that are sensitive/vulnerable be made a bulleted list. The first item on that list is not one of the nodes. Can it not be intended or moved into the description before the list?

Thanks.

On Aug 14, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net<mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net>> wrote:

This message starts a Last Call on draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-17:

 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-17

This marks the beginning of the last calls on the yang push suite of drafts.
Given the size and number of documents, the chairs decided to break the
reviews up into pieces so as to get focus on each in turn.  We are choosing
to go top-down, starting with yang-push and ending with the "notif" drafts.
We plan to submit the drafts for publication when they are ready as a
collective.  The goal is to do all this prior to IETF 103.

We understand that, in reviewing yang-push, there is a need to consider the
subscribed-notifications draft.  We will not be surprised if, in the course
of things, both drafts are updated, even though the review is primarily on
the yang-push draft.

While it's always nice to receive messages of support, at this time, the
question isn't so much if the working group supports the work, than if
the document is ready to progress.  The chairs need to see reviews that
indicate thorough end-to-end reading of the text.  Of course, if there
are any objections, these should be brought forward now as well.

The current version (-17) of this draft was published on July 1st, just
before the IETF 102 meeting.  The datatracker page for the draft is here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push.

Thanks,
Kent (and Mahesh)

_______________________________________________
Netconf mailing list
Netconf@ietf.org<mailto:Netconf@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>