Re: [Netconf] Last Call on yang-push-17

Thanks, Kent (and Mahesh), and to the WG for the review effort, discussion, and excellent comments received! 
We plan to close on the remaining comments and post a new revision shortly (before end-of-week).  
--- Alex

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Netconf [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 8:50 AM
> To: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Netconf] Last Call on yang-push-17
> 
> 
> This message successfully concludes the Last Call on yang-push-17/18 started on
> the Aug 14th.
> 
> Authors, please be sure to review and respond to all threads, as some comments
> have not been acknowledged yet.  Please be sure to close all active threads, and
> then post a -19 for shepherd review.
> 
> As shepherd, I first ask if anyone feels -19 does not adequately address a
> comment they made during the Last Call.
> 
> Please be sure that the -19 passes all validation tools (idnits, yang validators,
> instance document validators) and that the tree-diagrams and correct. IIRC, the
> artwork in this draft is placed by hand, the draft is not dynamically-generated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kent (and Mahesh)
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> This message starts a Last Call on draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-17:
> 
>   https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dietf-2Dnetconf-2Dyang-2Dpush-
> 2D17&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-
> ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=1L
> Lk6QUIkxQApwV8mxhT6WSSG-
> WaaypiuZUJsl2qb3E&s=DUZp7tCFFK0jyAJqqmxBdHPvzJTs9Jx2KKtFmSgHcr4&e=
> 
> 
> This marks the beginning of the last calls on the yang push suite of drafts.
> Given the size and number of documents, the chairs decided to break the
> reviews up into pieces so as to get focus on each in turn.  We are choosing to go
> top-down, starting with yang-push and ending with the "notif" drafts.
> We plan to submit the drafts for publication when they are ready as a collective.
> The goal is to do all this prior to IETF 103.
> 
> We understand that, in reviewing yang-push, there is a need to consider the
> subscribed-notifications draft.  We will not be surprised if, in the course of
> things, both drafts are updated, even though the review is primarily on the yang-
> push draft.
> 
> While it's always nice to receive messages of support, at this time, the question
> isn't so much if the working group supports the work, than if the document is
> ready to progress.  The chairs need to see reviews that indicate thorough end-
> to-end reading of the text.  Of course, if there are any objections, these should
> be brought forward now as well.
> 
> The current version (-17) of this draft was published on July 1st, just before the
> IETF 102 meeting.  The datatracker page for the draft is here:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dnetconf-2Dyang-
> 2Dpush&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-
> ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=1L
> Lk6QUIkxQApwV8mxhT6WSSG-
> WaaypiuZUJsl2qb3E&s=qC3PkShA3xiGVunhU48D8iJUeyfNnsZkXjLw1CekLwM&e
> =.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Kent (and Mahesh)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netconf&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Sc
> bfh0UjBXeMK-
> ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=1L
> Lk6QUIkxQApwV8mxhT6WSSG-WaaypiuZUJsl2qb3E&s=C-
> pXv3m9iMS8eDFI5ILgL39gYzsMypjrQW1TBLKhN-s&e=
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf