Re: [Netconf] Last Call on yang-push-17

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Mon, 27 August 2018 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A8D130E41 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K-7F5dbttx56 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6729130E3C for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id s17-v6so234989plp.7 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=J5b2WfMYjYnjipovQw5jq/46y8DS+a4NZU29eNHR6Rs=; b=k3HG1nP2UD9/9hs2dg/wuUBUcYDPuXcyjpK1bHvdpEJqTMP4xdINoJ4EZvF6mEW/jq sPPbXYDdtYf4GjVtYs1OxrYKPEuEAqTt4hfY57UtMKJIUyqb5dDihCNUpZ3Pv6mDi5iJ Ni49em/5XfY9pUX868vSP9EbcYB99fV/rfRmyA/clxRZhF1sBNAQFrU4QyBVkaQGDrFB 5NFPf20/B+SNRHofoD9oSChHyyNPD7v+stOlFFfNnQJRvzyIKuOD8zyvMSfhv2R0x6nk ei+tSWEKDIN325/iPQqC0XWqJyx7nGHf5KnOKjoz12wiE8dL4lU+E4Pql9X8TlouW+Nf Pl8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=J5b2WfMYjYnjipovQw5jq/46y8DS+a4NZU29eNHR6Rs=; b=pePt9rGtxJkdF1qZEnzCWtiRnY+pYZmPXZWoy0M6mLUNJLRAIk2jJL1IKBnYQxJX4B QCSB8AmUkoBVHKsNg439JBVkOO8ce+cHpjLGzfRti9vPuKYmMDZS/vbSvE70HC18b6O9 TbyhdTPOoooXQg3EnPWcYxGvNfsuk9hpGwb96LncsRZJ3r2l7jXvk0gE03l9kJvu635W fcioepvEwUz3a1hKbhKHA7YQA6l/ChgKs3nNnwF4wRAi0+WZGi+vQ96sFdFdb3QFMvkL fqkzL9hyLQ/MObOtI2KCX6dqxbqig0O50T3PIJ0kDMv+kHxOMhf1uhNVVT2QZ8+aqB1c FC5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BVwRx5uDOshkCT1neMkCeCv1NSTdovy+vk6XD3sWnc1AAYxlAw YYwicD4sAUJl51njxOX5BqJ0QGKl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaQ5mB5xEw4e9wctLqUIEolIKuB6gMh7vfLJpIP/sV/T2IpcPMmsk7d0TNDju7Lbl3B0CC1vw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d887:: with SMTP id b7-v6mr110945plz.329.1535409825220; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4700:1280:409c:e4b2:5eda:640c? ([2601:647:4700:1280:409c:e4b2:5eda:640c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o20-v6sm604134pfj.35.2018.08.27.15.43.44 for <netconf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4F922C3B-E36C-41AB-90F1-EB2E6F20A930"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:44:46 -0700
References: <BC944567-EC5F-42DA-983E-95493635B461@juniper.net>
To: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <BC944567-EC5F-42DA-983E-95493635B461@juniper.net>
Message-Id: <C614D2CF-D1AE-4B1B-B434-F8C3E02940EE@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/bpTolZbLYCSDx3G07M5VVNvCzu8>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Last Call on yang-push-17
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 22:43:51 -0000

I have not reviewed the entire document, but have looked at the Security Considerations section.

The document follows the template defined in OPS-Dir wiki here <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines>, but there is a reference in the template that needs to be updated.

s/NETCONF access control model/Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM)/

Also, can the list of subtrees and data nodes that are sensitive/vulnerable be made a bulleted list. The first item on that list is not one of the nodes. Can it not be intended or moved into the description before the list?

Thanks.

> On Aug 14, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> This message starts a Last Call on draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-17:
> 
>  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-17
> 
> 
> This marks the beginning of the last calls on the yang push suite of drafts.
> Given the size and number of documents, the chairs decided to break the 
> reviews up into pieces so as to get focus on each in turn.  We are choosing
> to go top-down, starting with yang-push and ending with the "notif" drafts.
> We plan to submit the drafts for publication when they are ready as a 
> collective.  The goal is to do all this prior to IETF 103.
> 
> We understand that, in reviewing yang-push, there is a need to consider the
> subscribed-notifications draft.  We will not be surprised if, in the course
> of things, both drafts are updated, even though the review is primarily on
> the yang-push draft.
> 
> While it's always nice to receive messages of support, at this time, the
> question isn't so much if the working group supports the work, than if
> the document is ready to progress.  The chairs need to see reviews that
> indicate thorough end-to-end reading of the text.  Of course, if there
> are any objections, these should be brought forward now as well.
> 
> The current version (-17) of this draft was published on July 1st, just
> before the IETF 102 meeting.  The datatracker page for the draft is here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Kent (and Mahesh)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com