Re: [Netconf] Last Call on yang-push-17

Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com> Tue, 28 August 2018 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D440130EB5 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Q2PepYP5AmR for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66ABC130E8E for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 097762E5FE5DB for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 02:23:20 +0100 (IST)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.399.0; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 02:23:21 +0100
Received: from SJCEML521-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.188]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.168]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:23:15 -0700
From: Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Last Call on yang-push-17
Thread-Index: AQHUM/QwQhG4fwKiUkSHvZFCs3Awe6TUcrlQ
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 01:23:14 +0000
Message-ID: <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EB59E63@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <BC944567-EC5F-42DA-983E-95493635B461@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <BC944567-EC5F-42DA-983E-95493635B461@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.193.35.68]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/htUfw8IjocHXtFiBy5SFfyBoLO0>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Last Call on yang-push-17
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 01:23:25 -0000

It probably goes without saying, but as one of the authors I support moving this document forward.  We are in the process of applying changes per the comments that are received and will post a -18 shortly.  All comments received so far are fairly minor and appear non-controversial.  
--- Alex

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Netconf [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 10:28 AM
> To: netconf@ietf.org
> Subject: [Netconf] Last Call on yang-push-17
> 
> This message starts a Last Call on draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-17:
> 
>   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-17
> 
> 
> This marks the beginning of the last calls on the yang push suite of drafts.
> Given the size and number of documents, the chairs decided to break the
> reviews up into pieces so as to get focus on each in turn.  We are choosing to
> go top-down, starting with yang-push and ending with the "notif" drafts.
> We plan to submit the drafts for publication when they are ready as a
> collective.  The goal is to do all this prior to IETF 103.
> 
> We understand that, in reviewing yang-push, there is a need to consider the
> subscribed-notifications draft.  We will not be surprised if, in the course of
> things, both drafts are updated, even though the review is primarily on the
> yang-push draft.
> 
> While it's always nice to receive messages of support, at this time, the
> question isn't so much if the working group supports the work, than if the
> document is ready to progress.  The chairs need to see reviews that indicate
> thorough end-to-end reading of the text.  Of course, if there are any
> objections, these should be brought forward now as well.
> 
> The current version (-17) of this draft was published on July 1st, just before
> the IETF 102 meeting.  The datatracker page for the draft is here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Kent (and Mahesh)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf