Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8525 (6484)

[Martin Björklund <[e-mail]>]

Jan Lindblad <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Rob, Martin,
> 
> Wouldn't changing the revision date be a massively
> non-backwards-compatible change?

Note that this is in the revision history list.

> Anyone might be importing this module by revision, and tools could be hardcoded towards the revision date, given that this is a pretty fundamental module.
> 
> What is the (technical) benefit of changing the date?

The idea is that if we ever do a new version of this module, we fix
the revision history list in that new version.


/martin



> 
> Best Regards,
> /jan
> 
> 
> > Hi Martin,
> > 
> > I agree, hold for doc update seems appropriate.
> > 
> > Any other comments?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Rob
> > 
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Martin Björklund <[e-mail]>
> >> Sent: 15 March 2021 09:24
> >> To: [e-mail]
> >> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-
> >> university.de; [e-mail]; Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> >> <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> >> [e-mail]
> >> Subject: Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8525 (6484)
> >> 
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> Wow, this is obviously a bug.
> >> 
> >> I am not sure it can be fixed with an errata however.  Perhaps "hold
> >> for document update"?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> /martin
> >> 
> >> 
> >> RFC Errata System <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8525,
> >>> "YANG Library".
> >>> 
> >>> --------------------------------------
> >>> You may review the report below and at:
> >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6484
> >>> 
> >>> --------------------------------------
> >>> Type: Technical
> >>> Reported by: Jernej Tuljak <[e-mail]>
> >>> 
> >>> Section: 4
> >>> 
> >>> Original Text
> >>> -------------
> >>>     revision 2016-04-09 {
> >>>       description
> >>>         "Initial revision.";
> >>>       reference
> >>>         "RFC 7895: YANG Module Library";
> >>>     }
> >>> 
> >>> Corrected Text
> >>> --------------
> >>>     revision 2016-06-21 {
> >>>       description
> >>>         "Initial revision.";
> >>>       reference
> >>>         "RFC 7895: YANG Module Library";
> >>>     }
> >>> 
> >>> Notes
> >>> -----
> >>> Initial revision of ietf-yang-library YANG module was 2016-06-21, not
> >> 2016-04-09.
> >>> 
> >>> Instructions:
> >>> -------------
> >>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> >>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> >>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> >>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >>> 
> >>> --------------------------------------
> >>> RFC8525 (draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-07)
> >>> --------------------------------------
> >>> Title               : YANG Library
> >>> Publication Date    : March 2019
> >>> Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, J. Schoenwaelder, K.
> >> Watsen, R. Wilton
> >>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> >>> Source              : Network Configuration
> >>> Area                : Operations and Management
> >>> Stream              : IETF
> >>> Verifying Party     : IESG
> >>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> netconf mailing list
> >>> [e-mail]
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > netconf mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> > 
>