Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll for draft-lengyel-netconf-notification-capabilities-02

I agree with Kent and correspondingly also with the priority sequence in 
the set of I-Ds - at least wrt YANG Push'esque I-Ds - highlighted by 
Eric before (a subset of three drafts first, if I remember correctly).

Viele Grüße,

Henk

On 08/09/2018 06:06 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
> 
> 
>> While I do support the adoption of this document, I wonder if this WG
>> really should add more work.  We have ~14 active drafts that we've
>> been working on for a very long time, and they are still not done,
>> mainly b/c of lack of reviews (which is due to the fact that the WG
>> have been busy with other docs).  I would prefer that the WG put some
>> effort into finishing the current set of documents before adopting new
>> work.
> 
> This is a good point, and one that I've raised in the past as well.
> 
> I don't mind adopting these drafts now, but I request that the
> authors restrain pushing on them hard until after the current
> backlog is dealt with.
> 
> Let's focus on getting the zerotouch, yang-push++, and client-server
> drafts done.  That's 12 drafts, and a whole lot of pages!
> 
> Kent // chair
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> 