IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] WG LC for three drafts

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Tue, 16 June 2020 23:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF853A0A80 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54PxnqeeWkQI for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF53A3A0A7D for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id m2so128375pjv.2 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=+XSiPbLLTrz7EmBMqYrj+zIOYu72BHOnz7xX/bucxsc=; b=CRRJhtbbWGWH/8iFgv+0bu6i/2TcJmT3dPyZLZEmlMCETMforu47Q4h6QHfQuEMqub wRacvs+twYXNulKsu5NSlqr6weIUQkZEbUoXGQDf88IpI4A64PbAfI6rhnQ1ZNemwhXu u3yqKXTLNLGoFtDpwwnkilC/5VoNargXwOPEnuu7gCl7HM+kchNNLvoxU6U4jXAPbSIH +6I0RhAg1AMATydpU6UZPpU1t9c5JbFr9t5uC6f7MCR5u4xscquQzC/8sS1NAJ1TKoO3 b2sDNwsRMsdnj1kdUbc90ky9f/OvFxDZStLmXVC7LsyWqJO4d9BR7aGiHZYcNauCezfZ CNEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=+XSiPbLLTrz7EmBMqYrj+zIOYu72BHOnz7xX/bucxsc=; b=HRp0t4k43ML1CBcYYvGR0bmizdggHnQmKJwfaLlIsIFjtnF+EDbxfhA1XLIfs4w73U 25yl1cQWUFqrSbU8FbHZ9qZsAoyaGICoecq4whlg2oQQO3y+/LsccU6aQd8pZkLLGEmP 66hiuv0Fk+Tds/lDjwUb3uWehV42S7/yIVY21jF+nwhc/7v7xKCC2cISIv8hd9VEOT+r i13kmo+QVv9D9cXOmlEytU9TUzNCqXcLkxw81t08yjX40e7y0un6UjQ9zy7Gesbtqkgj dJxzyVpqMjIo8+3J1krd2TNPkW8au+lB6m4MFNqmHDDTOgw1Pbzz59slN23/ldiRXGGf 8EqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5328LdPUCf9HSXuL5NNolDUkRpIUlcK++Fn8y7C7D0/MC9g2kVVx dWI+VkNpVwoMj478YqZWZMRjudmIjA4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxJ8gWPFt8Nmx/6oey1P2LUcaAEpBedMtT72MvuaqUBhub3inSoYwMs3xrijlA406m/oNmcw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f0d4:: with SMTP id fa20mr5282563pjb.160.1592350660510; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:c80b:fb17:1422:39d0? ([2601:647:5600:5020:c80b:fb17:1422:39d0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id nl5sm3804375pjb.36.2020.06.16.16.37.38 for <netconf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2F841AAD-5306-4D1A-82C7-D7E45E99954E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:37:38 -0700
References: <A1A5BD42-AB3F-477A-B291-81E213A2F0DB@gmail.com>
To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <A1A5BD42-AB3F-477A-B291-81E213A2F0DB@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <6420A299-607B-4824-B234-48901154234D@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/a2kByJuXp1tGRHAMsQEkKoQn5ak>
Subject: Re: [netconf] WG LC for three drafts
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 23:37:43 -0000

The WGLC on these three drafts has received insufficient review at this time. I am going to extend the LC by another week to allow for more review of these documents. While specific comments would be great, even saying “I have reviewed the draft, and support its publication” is helpful.

As a reminder, we are following option 3 in this message <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/UDNkN5SOmeDaHA5pHYhe-v0l6MI/>. What that means is that once Kent has updated the tcp-client-server draft, it will be added to this set of drafts for LC before 108. The remaining drafts, ssh-client-server, tls-client-server http-client-server, netconf-client-server, restconf-client-server will be sent for LC after 108.

Thanks.

> On Jun 2, 2020, at 4:48 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> NETCONF WG,
> 
> The authors of
> 
> - draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types
> - draft-ietf-netconf-keystore
> - draft-ietf-netconf-trust-anchors
> 
> have indicated that these drafts are ready for Last Call (LC).
> 
> This kicks of a 2 week WG LC for the three drafts. Please review and send any comments to the WG mailing list or by responding to this e-mail. Comments can be statements such as, I read/reviewed the document and believe it is ready for publication, or I have concerns about the document. For the latter, please indicate what your concerns are. 
> 
> Any reports on implementation status or plans to implement are also very useful.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Mahesh Jethanandani (as co-chair)
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email