IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] WGLC: draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-06

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Fri, 19 February 2021 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A813A128A; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:42:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=S9cwar53; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=Nz61eNvv
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XFmmMIFzp-2H; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:42:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 497F03A1270; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:42:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8132; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1613756564; x=1614966164; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Tl/Zu6vSyzV7QZoFWDFPZWmECCxow/w8n9vxy/XWYxQ=; b=S9cwar535tkOLORPE7clE/63cwv1u0KFfLnvCOLC4kyjVBTVM5+pAAQO 13AE6Or4sENZJ4XeHsdw04hlqb/XkZGryoJH3X0KXgcPq9ONmO5abnOci l+pFQ50xl6OLZlAmr9wS8J2a4Btf5p1IaCtnA7I1/afp4/+hOZTfrvfxv U=;
X-Files: smime.p7s : 3975
X-IPAS-Result: A0AYAAAs9i9gmIwNJK1iHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQGBewcBAQsBgVIpKH0sLjYxCoQ3g0gDhFmJNQOZHoEuFIERA1QEBwEBAQoDAQEdCwoCBAEBhAlEAoIMAiU0CQ4CAwEBAQMCAwEBAQEFAQEBAgEGBBQBAQEBAQEBAYY2DYZEAQEBAwEBASEdAQEsCwEECwIBCCUdAgICJQslAQEEAQ0FCAaCEksBgX5XAw4RDwEOo18CiiV2gTKDBAEBBoUdGIILBwMGgTgBgVKBI4QHhkQmHIFBQYERQ4JXPoJdAQGBRRyDFDSCK4FhaUwYBCIhEFsmAXoHKAYBuWcKgnuBG4NNgmqUYIMxikyVQ5RHnUeEQgICAgIEBQIOAQEGgVQ4gVlwFTuCaVAXAg2OHxmDVoUUhUVzNwIGAQkBAQMJfIoIAYEOAQE
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:uk1UPhaD6ysPNVTrmOJfvJD/LSx94ef9IxIV55w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el21QaXD5rS9+lJjazQvryzEWAD4JPUtncEfdQMUhIekswZkkQmB9LNEkz0KvPmLklYVMRPXVNo5Te3ZE5SHsuteFTOuXC0qzgfBka3OQ98PO+gHInUgoy+3Pyz/JuGZQJOiXK9bLp+IQ/wox/Ws5wdgJBpLeA6zR6arw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,189,1610409600"; d="p7s'?scan'208";a="650102023"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 19 Feb 2021 17:42:43 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (xch-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.14]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 11JHghLS013788 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:42:43 GMT
Received: from xfe-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.251) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:42:42 -0600
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xfe-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.251) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.792.3; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 11:42:41 -0600
Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 12:42:41 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZehYmTsULzSfiaiwQN0zXbp3RWz1QRIEmxqIvhnKujU29gFiD1lzZ388yhI6RvWukUrRxVIKW1k8TLGC5Uv9e8++wa1o9H8wUQms4TVxYV9x89YNMFLNtYXv8yLgO83SSPSuEpTUq7zdS+gdIPrtwgH8PwHNkVo1j3uTyOAbQ7EDI2lLLFISnSiO5ZvtNFulfwCkHOUeXYbTiDRmX86YoqvJDOQLG87bM7jqDNDH2JgirgJ6WFL5F32WKvKsfFnG6rUERHZ5AG/thpMB9KopZUKsyf5e92i5f5NYwAXMB5Mwawh7PvtDYxY+8S9IjxhhV2yYgeKw8cMNUQ8yGfM0aA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Tzus6fkCLSN+Oybo8kU2+OZ18mJk2CA7bmyKi7r0mlo=; b=biWMOX7+DcsqTDztpm+LuzPBOvjM1ROO3VUFoa1cYee5MTlwVU3uGPD5kN2AsMcHPvdf1Uard+cZ+ikocLUHStopyWYXPhRWkk+WxnBZ1/igZ+LJMnH6vjzscF6Szl8BHgwzFReE6A/7BBazNnAtcD9pjF4SfuuLYEZptXuBVtBvWMdhLEf/0C2Vm+dzzWwZsZdbIfvKUDKmDD7o5/zZrgnrjOAh+3XveSuKSfda0RRpn0Lo83k2h43X+CCm8iiHpLRDWG+53IDj3+cjsFHyw7Xcu5X4vOKAoXIv4mf1QlWByPrCS9hhJ1HSNnKMGa87Ap52RvvwdSTUoNtQnjhLXQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Tzus6fkCLSN+Oybo8kU2+OZ18mJk2CA7bmyKi7r0mlo=; b=Nz61eNvvOlgdGoUptISp7MdLMczahgL8ULv/JOONReVIf5lPQ7v3QyBsPSrTRb7ZgncbfojIVAE1Tasb0FrVfJceqB48REyPGWJrKGoL3vV0VlAF7fcixLWTAALkoCc74iEmVtxRNi7NlzYiNxnPsaiT3x3OoZL3ZP53oWMM24I=
Received: from BL0PR11MB3122.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:75::32) by BL0PR11MB2881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:7e::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3846.27; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:42:40 +0000
Received: from BL0PR11MB3122.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::88f5:c7e1:3338:cecf]) by BL0PR11MB3122.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::88f5:c7e1:3338:cecf%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3846.042; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:42:40 +0000
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>, "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netconf] WGLC: draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-06
Thread-Index: AdbqdYOgUz15Gs1wTZ6RgVXH+iq7RQGk0X5QA+xnatABYsEcAAAmtReg
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:42:40 +0000
Message-ID: <BL0PR11MB312282FE91F08D0F6C2DB47DA1849@BL0PR11MB3122.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB43669EEF05655F07E39FE4BEB5A80@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BL0PR11MB3122129B92F8B02D99081112A1BD9@BL0PR11MB3122.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BL0PR11MB3122FAD872B1FF80FDC6E0ABA18C9@BL0PR11MB3122.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <01000177b7428848-f48b34d9-2240-4916-9a62-2be1f06bb7df-000000@email.amazonses.com>
In-Reply-To: <01000177b7428848-f48b34d9-2240-4916-9a62-2be1f06bb7df-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: watsen.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;watsen.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [108.18.141.61]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e9e91b2a-fe4b-4686-991d-08d8d4fdc119
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BL0PR11MB2881:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BL0PR11MB2881CA1364C10CCD4097A2B2A1849@BL0PR11MB2881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BL0PR11MB3122.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(376002)(396003)(346002)(136003)(366004)(39860400002)(316002)(83380400001)(55016002)(99936003)(33656002)(6506007)(478600001)(71200400001)(54906003)(52536014)(8676002)(110136005)(66616009)(5660300002)(2906002)(66556008)(7696005)(64756008)(66476007)(76116006)(4326008)(966005)(66446008)(8936002)(86362001)(66946007)(26005)(9686003)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02AB_01D706BB.80BF9850"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BL0PR11MB3122.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e9e91b2a-fe4b-4686-991d-08d8d4fdc119
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Feb 2021 17:42:40.2990 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: aYCCTslnkvY9u/8lNOdP1otjdGFIUV0IttJdz2S9fvqLzEabtaahcAHuBlODZuy1
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL0PR11MB2881
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.14, xch-aln-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/g7sadTYJTBIuAwG_DzeNwpY9t48>
Subject: Re: [netconf] WGLC: draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-06
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:42:53 -0000

Hi Kent and Mahesh,

> Hi Eric,
> 
> > The majority of examples showing <subscription-started> have been removed.
> > The last place where they are discussed in -07 is the end of Section 2.   I
> > still feel that describing the coverage or non-coverage of the set of
> > subscription state change notifications within a stream of event
> > provides a useful context.
> 
> We’re unclear why this document should need or want to repeat what is defined
> in another RFC.  This document regards how to send notifications, regardless
> where they are defined.
> 
> As you note, Section 2 currently has the following statement:
> 
>       Note that, for RFC 8639 configured subscriptions, the very first
>       notification must be the "subscription-started" notification.</t>
> 
> Perhaps we should remove this sentence too, or replace “must” with “would”,
> so it doesn’t should normative?   Please advise.

The intent of my comment was mainly to assist the understandability between drafts.   Subscription state change notifications are a part of RFC8639.  This draft's Section 1.1 Applicability statement *totally appropriately* notes that only a subset of RFC8639 constructs are applicable.  As a result subscription state change notifications are not required when leveraging this specification.  

If there is a minimum set of subscription state change notifications required or desired, it would be good to list them.   I suspect there are not (as per the Applicability Statement).  Based on this, I believe it be worth listing some implications of not having the subscription state change notifications in the Security Considerations section.  E.g., not sending a <subscription-modified> might mean a receiver can't be sure that a compliant publisher is sending the full set of events expected.   Such a statement would make it easily apparent to an implementer of the differences in functionality delivered as they choose which RFCs to support.

Eric
 
> Thanks,
> Kent and Mahesh
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email