Re: [Netconf] In an update, when is a delete a delete?

Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@alumni.stanford.edu> Thu, 18 May 2017 03:06 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@alumni.stanford.edu>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28550129BDE for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 May 2017 20:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qhWEproUzLwo for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 May 2017 20:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com (mail-pf0-f193.google.com [209.85.192.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D5C12EB9B for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 May 2017 20:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-f193.google.com with SMTP id n23so3986842pfb.3 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 May 2017 20:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M7yrOwDWYoCI2BcJ/YbIsph8k4xuASUGx2QYe7vkg40=; b=RW5yu6u8PC7aQKlT0xudsT8Uw6eGYFalkhVGDQywO/5XAStwVYMaKwX+CmodlfZ3ML uaSm9vXYmZVQ4QCECv+DrcOmFpEVRvc4s15b/w41RSCn+yGk/sRquAkf0QjHR38Si8Fa VKiiTLPNpdcuYeJEmPlgMl3dm+ZW2/Qdg8vxlIQZGEaUqbCrmbRNX6KiJjU9Vqi3sn6Z PpStuwvKwknsfqIljroA//Pu1JDIo+9U987LagQSoz5lE00M58VXRj718z94tFAD290g c4lIPSShsGcomQWRrRNDnv6I+ksGhguAo+JhZ2nU43bMmxMLrJgyn2aCocnhK1fLBaZg tEfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBEjTUQ1vgKqADWBmbynsU4js/8mvG+6TBbn3n0yMZUvphXqLnE GBfrp0DOBun++LTgVNgdow==
X-Received: by 10.84.128.66 with SMTP id 60mr2124919pla.167.1495076518213; Wed, 17 May 2017 20:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.113] (c-24-130-218-233.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.218.233]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d13sm6151839pfl.12.2017.05.17.20.01.57 for <netconf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 May 2017 20:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: netconf@ietf.org
References: <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0DFAE8C1@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@alumni.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <591D0EA2.8070308@alumni.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 20:01:54 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0DFAE8C1@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/iVvxiVq9Tgq7zBCye96v4Hb3sGM>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] In an update, when is a delete a delete?
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 03:06:41 -0000

Hi -

On 5/17/2017 2:29 PM, Alexander Clemm wrote:
> Thoughts?  Any preferences between 1, 2, and 3?

1 is simply awful.
2 sounds like the right general direction to me.
3 sounds klugey, but perhaps I misunderstood the proposal

Randy