IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] mbj's WGLC review of yang-push-17

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Mon, 24 September 2018 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902F8130DE1 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FjDNQlFkCQeY for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FC9130DDD for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.61]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8637A1AE0388; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:36:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:36:12 +0200
Message-Id: <20180924.093612.1791958587714330227.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: alexander.clemm@huawei.com
Cc: kwatsen@juniper.net, netconf@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EB691A5@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <3B841FC9-63F4-41DD-BCE2-AA543FDADA5C@juniper.net> <20180920.094520.798604819426315275.mbj@tail-f.com> <644DA50AFA8C314EA9BDDAC83BD38A2E0EB691A5@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/wlMbv4-2bLyVaw_cLi8mLvNKfyE>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] mbj's WGLC review of yang-push-17
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:36:19 -0000

Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com> wrote:
> I am about to post -19 but I do not like the suggested change to go
> from timeticks to seconds.
> 
> Seconds is a fairly coarse unit.  I would not be surprised to see
> requirements for finer granularity in the future, even more so in
> virtualization and controller scenarios in which we start to see YANG
> being used.  There are applications that use single second periods
> today so I think it is entirely conceivable to see need for subsecond
> support down the line.  To allow periods only in units of seconds
> would seem to unnecessarily hobble ourselves.  Keeping things to
> timeticks is more futureproof IMHO.

Ok.


/martin



> 
> --- Alex
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Bjorklund [mailto:mbj@tail-f.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 12:45 AM
> > To: kwatsen@juniper.net
> > Cc: Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>; netconf@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Netconf] mbj's WGLC review of yang-push-17
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Thanks Kent, I missed this one.
> > 
> > Authors, I suggest we change the type for "yp:period" from
> > "yang:timeticks" to
> > "uint32" with units "seconds".
> > 
> > See the thread starting at
> > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/SU1VnBV1Ea5Ae3QzPn_joyyRnZ
> > o
> > 
> > 
> > /martin
> > 
> > 
> > Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
> > > Hi Martin,
> > >
> > > I'm surprised to see that your review doesn't suggest changing
> > > "yp:period" from yang:timeticks to seconds.
> > >
> > > You had previously made this suggestion in another thread, but it's
> > > still timeticks in -18.
> > >
> > > Kent // all hat
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email