[Netconf] [netconf] Editorial change for draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf

Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com> Thu, 31 May 2018 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4FB12EBBB for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2018 01:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RuB9yVeE8p-d for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2018 01:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7EA912EADB for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2018 01:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id DC4FC8564751C for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2018 09:55:02 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEML421-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Thu, 31 May 2018 09:55:03 +0100
Received: from DGGEML510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([]) by dggeml421-hub.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Thu, 31 May 2018 16:54:54 +0800
From: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>
To: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netconf] Editorial change for draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf
Thread-Index: AdP4o/pDYGsbcIy+R1mGYaCmr80MLg==
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 08:54:54 +0000
Message-ID: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB3AC2@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB3AC2dggeml510mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/xYBBgAGWQdbzmUaP7rrshremXyc>
Subject: [Netconf] [netconf] Editorial change for draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 08:55:10 -0000

Change 1:
Section 3.1.1

The "config-filter" parameter can be used to retrieve only "config
   true" or "config false" nodes.

The "config-filter" parameter can be used to retrieve only "config
   true" or "config false" nodes. Note that if "config-filter" is set to "false",
configuration ancestors (if any) and list key leafs (if any)
are also returned.

"retrieve only "config false" nodes maybe misleading. So the use-full text written in RFC 8040 in Example 3 can be re-used here.

With Regards,
Rohit R Ranade