Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible? draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps

[Hesham Soliman <[e-mail]>]

>
>>
>>[SJ] In my knowledge, an MN doesn't need to be changed if the MR acts
>>as a moving MAG, which has the responsibility of MN detection i.e. MN's
>>attach and detach, and sending/receiving PBU/PBA instead of the MN.
>>Regarding on this issue, it was described at the Paris meeting I
>>remember.
>
>=> Moving MAG = MR in RFC 3963 basically. So it's not PMIP anymore it's
>normal MIPv6. 
>
>[SJ] Moving MAG is not a MR defined in RFC 3963. See above how I defined
>the
>moving MAG.

=> Apart from calling it a PBU, as opposed to a BU, what is the real
difference between a moving MAG and MR?
Ironically, people called the Prefix Binding Updates PBUs in early
discussions of NEMO.

Are you saying it sends one BU per address, as opposed to one BU for the
entire prefix? If so, why? a prefix BU is much more efficient. That would
just be a less efficient version of MIP-based MRs.

Hesham