Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible? draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps

[Hesham Soliman <[e-mail]>]

>

>
>[SJ] Actually, there's no standard draft yet for PMIP-NEMO we're
>discussing.
>Protocol designs for MR would be varied depending on the design
>perspective.
>But one example could be as follows. Moving MAG would attach to PMIPv6
>domain and have unique prefix assigned from a LMA. For attaching and
>detaching mobile node, moving MAG should send PBU instead of MN
>individually. However, in the case of mobile network's moving, PBU sent
>by a
>MAG detecting mMAG's attachment to a LMA would be enough. Moving MAG
>doesn't
>need to send anything for network moving event itself. Following extended
>LMA binding cache entry can be an example.
>When the LMA receives PBU sent by the MAG regarding on moving MAG
>attachment
>(MAG1 -> MAG2), it only changes tunnel endpoint of mMAG to MAG 2 and
>doesn't
>need to touch MNs' entries belonging to mMAG.

=> Doesn't sound like something you would deploy on shared links, but I
guess that's a generic statement for PMIP.
Anyway, lets see when a draft is proposed.

Hesham

>
>
>ID		Prefix		AR		M flag
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>mMAG 1	Pref1::/64	MAG 2	no
>MN 1		Pref2::/64	mMAG 1	yes
>
>
>Actually, the above might be one example among many possible ways .. and
>it's not my idea. FYI, you can see following.
>I just wanted to describe possibility of PMIPv6-NEMO support using moving
>MAG.
>
>http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2009.4939291
>
>
>
>