Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible? draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Fri, 13 July 2012 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C979311E80B5 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EKNg1WpLQ1Aj for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gh0-f172.google.com (mail-gh0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F06011E808D for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so4267852ghb.31 for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=+wO3JwzcVyH3YpeWkLVT0ZMVjqmU64HJ1IOfUET5Uws=; b=Gww5v7qwBBScVO46csGkqHU7KJPG0THKj8w6+uXnZ43fEOeYK1ZzMVcE0OS4qL1juz p0+FQHwtnMAPC7K78IvIfZkSa1QPL6fHoSl6555wLPWJoSmH5VzLijqcDEqRFWACtSvx 5Ws2oY3Apgaax665r5Nhm7EqiD02QUm0nhnNtVVZrAr0sSHOnVRS9B45A3d2pOQNkjwX U1iJERsiaNM3uBQNHcoA7q+J/RR/ZCaXKz5A1AF+t/lrv/mxE4oaN0ts6iyvt8AAcuZT UJiv59/HH2WxfFC0sI6nw7yuQaAx2T6/PaEnQM14PuwqyRvml9QN5vZn10v8b9DBMIJp 7xHA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.183.200 with SMTP id eo8mr2365977igc.63.1342205293360; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.207.167 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:48:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAceDNP1ywXMzxxWM7J2ABeSiaMUcUS42+LkRvUCE-QgOUw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible? draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 18:47:38 -0000

Hi Alex,

Thanks for bringing this issue up :-).

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Alexandru Petrescu
<alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> NETEXT WG members,
>
> It was said at times that PMIP-NEMO is impossible.  PMIP is a core
> network protocol, where mobility is supported without modifying the MN.
>
> Or, in some PMIP-NEMO proposals, the MN _is_ modified: for example it
> adds DHCP Client on it; or other times it performs HNP Division.
>
> BEcause of this there exist statements that PMIP-NEMO is impossible.
>
> Do you think there are other reasons why PMIP-NEMO is impossible?
>

Basically, Nemo requires an MR. MR must be placed at the PMIP MN. This
is the fundamental problem. I don't think it is possible to make an MR
without changing MN. So far I have not seen any solutions.

You are talking about a protocol that is designed to not to modify MN.

> Do you think that running DHCP Client on MN is a modification to MN?
>

Standard clients are OK.

The problem with the WG draft is that it requires an DHCP client
extended with PD.

I would like draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps to be revised with
a discussion of this fundamental problem in PMIP-Nemo.


Regards,

Behcet