IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible? draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps

"Seil Jeon" <seiljeon@av.it.pt> Sat, 14 July 2012 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <seiljeon@av.it.pt>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE1621F87B9 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 07:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XTcmW3RAgeCO for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 07:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av.it.pt (mail.av.it.pt [193.136.92.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C2721F87B8 for <netext@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 07:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [188.80.101.79] (account seiljeon@av.it.pt HELO ATNoGSeil) by av.it.pt (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with ESMTPSA id 65470750; Sat, 14 Jul 2012 15:07:30 +0100
From: Seil Jeon <seiljeon@av.it.pt>
To: 'Hesham Soliman' <hesham@elevatemobile.com>
References: <001501cd6132$9b3e8fc0$d1bbaf40$@av.it.pt> <CC2735D7.267D9%hesham@elevatemobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <CC2735D7.267D9%hesham@elevatemobile.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 15:07:30 +0100
Message-ID: <000601cd61ca$03068760$09139620$@av.it.pt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGQPixyBA5p0ovlLhTN6QeR7kwTzZejFr4w
Content-Language: ko
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible? draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:06:56 -0000

Hi Hesham,

Regards,

Seil

-----Original Message-----
From: Hesham Soliman [mailto:hesham@elevatemobile.com] 
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2012 5:45 AM
To: Seil Jeon; sarikaya@ieee.org
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] PMIP purists - is PMIP-NEMO impossible?
draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps

>
>[SJ] In my knowledge, an MN doesn't need to be changed if the MR acts 
>as a moving MAG, which has the responsibility of MN detection i.e. MN's 
>attach and detach, and sending/receiving PBU/PBA instead of the MN. 
>Regarding on this issue, it was described at the Paris meeting I remember.

=> Moving MAG = MR in RFC 3963 basically. So it's not PMIP anymore it's
normal MIPv6. 

[SJ] Moving MAG is not a MR defined in RFC 3963. See above how I defined the
moving MAG.



Hesham

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email