Re: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Network Information Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6?

 1. Yes.
2. Yes.

-- 
IMARA Team, INRIA, France. 
Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random

#email: hurryon (at) gmail (dot) com || jong-hyouk.lee (at) inria (dot) fr
#webpage: http://sites.google.com/site/hurryon/
Sent with Sparrow (http://bit.ly/sigsprw)

On Thursday, August 11, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com (mailto:Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com) wrote:

> 
> The proposal: "Access Network Information Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6"
> <draft-gundavelli-netext-access-network-option-01.txt> Was discussed
> at the IETF81 Netext WG meeting.
> 
> Rough consensus from polling the WG members in the room indicated:
> "
> 5 have read the draft
> 4 think it is a relevant problem and we have to solve it
> 2 think it is no clear reason to carry more than ATT
> "
> 
> This email is a follow up on the WG ML before we make a decision. So
> please respond to the following questions:
> 
> Q1: Do you agree with the problem, solution and benefit of the ANI
> option as described in I-D:
> draft-gundavelli-netext-access-network-option-01.txt?
> 
> Yes [ ]
> No [ ]
> 
> Q2: Do you support adoption of the I-D
> draft-gundavelli-netext-access-network-option-01.txt as the starting
> point for working on this feature in the WG?
> 
> Yes [ ]
> No [ ]
> 
> 
> Please respond by August 18th to the above questions on the ML.
> 
> -Chairs
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org (mailto:netext@ietf.org)
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext