IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] Update on flow mobility following discussion with ADs

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 02 March 2011 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AC43A6863 for <netext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:48:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N9aIxTO06gHz for <netext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:48:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022763A6831 for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:48:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89BB2CC32; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:49:25 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YvGv3scZzE9g; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:49:25 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA6D2CC28; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:49:25 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4D6E9F44.7060202@piuha.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:49:24 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sgundave@cisco.com
References: <97683F8C138FB243AAC90CEFB48ABF15092675D6@008-AM1MPN1-004.mgdnok.nokia.com> <C993BB95.119F6%sgundave@cisco.com> <97683F8C138FB243AAC90CEFB48ABF150926763D@008-AM1MPN1-004.mgdnok.nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <97683F8C138FB243AAC90CEFB48ABF150926763D@008-AM1MPN1-004.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netext@ietf.org, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
Subject: Re: [netext] Update on flow mobility following discussion with ADs
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:48:22 -0000

Sri:

What Basavaraj said. I don't think the number of specifications is a big 
concern either now or later. Split the documents the way you like. Lets 
discuss functionality, robustness, assumptions instead -- those are 
important.

(And of course, splitting to different specifications should not be 
misused to hide a technical omission or a problem.)

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email