RE: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG Document Adoption
"Singh Ajoy-ASINGH1" <ASINGH1@motorola.com> Sun, 08 April 2007 06:23 UTC
Return-path: <netlmm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HaQnk-0006wo-Bp; Sun, 08 Apr 2007 02:23:00 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HaQni-0006ui-R6 for netlmm@ietf.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2007 02:22:58 -0400
Received: from mail128.messagelabs.com ([216.82.250.131]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HaQnh-00051q-Fz for netlmm@ietf.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2007 02:22:58 -0400
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: ASINGH1@motorola.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-128.messagelabs.com!1176013376!6214578!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.10.7.1; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [129.188.136.8]
Received: (qmail 23340 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2007 06:22:56 -0000
Received: from motgate8.mot.com (HELO motgate8.mot.com) (129.188.136.8) by server-12.tower-128.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2007 06:22:56 -0000
Received: from az33exr01.mot.com ([10.64.251.231]) by motgate8.mot.com (8.12.11/Motorola) with ESMTP id l386MtVc011081 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 23:22:55 -0700 (MST)
Received: from az10vts04 (az10vts04.mot.com [10.64.251.245]) by az33exr01.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id l386MsQW019430 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 01:22:55 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from de01exm71.ds.mot.com (de01exm71.am.mot.com [10.176.8.27]) by az33exr01.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l386MrJZ019424 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 01:22:54 -0500 (CDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG Document Adoption
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 02:22:51 -0400
Message-ID: <B0E7E3680CE6D34D9143AAA7604645380195B34C@de01exm71.ds.mot.com>
In-Reply-To: <C24CB51D5AA800449982D9BCB903251357570E@NAEX13.na.qualcomm.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG Document Adoption
Thread-Index: Acd3lkcsuSIMnlXZR+ej5LxtWrFF7QCDxp+w
From: Singh Ajoy-ASINGH1 <ASINGH1@motorola.com>
To: "Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyan@qualcomm.com>, netlmm@ietf.org
X-Vontu: Pass
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
Cc:
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, Vidya, Is there any goal to make PMIPv6 solution IPR free? It may be good idea to start thinking about IPR from beginning so that we can minimize impact of IPR on PMIP solution before it is too late. I did see several IPR postings but did not find much discussion about how can we workaround these IPRs from base protocol? Regards, Ajoy All, The consensus call for WG document adoption for the PMIPv6 protocol has concluded. Based on all the responses received, it appears that we have rough consensus to adopt draft-sgundave-mip6-proxymip6 as the baseline for a WG protocol document. Please note that this only means that we will use that document as a starting point and the document must reflect WG consensus on all points discussed until now or later. There is a separate question of whether the WG is interested in standardizing the approach of anchoring the MAG functionality as well. I will send out a separate email seeking input on that. I will also send an update on the open issues that we discussed in Prague. As a reminder, the WG will have an opportunity to review the position once we have heard about the IPR situation from all the parties concerned. The current IPR status is still the same as presented at the Prague meeting (Please see Slide 5 of http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07mar/slides/netlmm-0.pdf for reference). Thanks, Vidya _______________________________________________ netlmm mailing list netlmm@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
- [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG Docum… Narayanan, Vidya
- Re: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG D… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG D… Basavaraj Patil
- RE: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG D… Narayanan, Vidya
- RE: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG D… Singh Ajoy-ASINGH1
- RE: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG D… Singh Ajoy-ASINGH1
- RE: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG D… Narayanan, Vidya