RE: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG Document Adoption

Hi Ajoy,
I will be collecting WG input on IPR concerns shortly. I was waiting to
have all the responses from the parties identified in the third party
IPR disclosure. There has been some delays with Qualcomm due to schedule
conflicts between the engineering and legal teams. I expect a response
to go out soon. I'll post something to the list shortly after. 

Thanks,
Vidya 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Singh Ajoy-ASINGH1 [mailto:ASINGH1@motorola.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 11:23 PM
> To: Narayanan, Vidya; netlmm@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG 
> Document Adoption
> 
> Hi, Vidya, 
> 
> Is there any goal to make PMIPv6 solution IPR free? It may be 
> good idea to start thinking about IPR from beginning so that 
> we can minimize impact of IPR on PMIP solution before it is too late.
> I did see several IPR postings but did not find much 
> discussion about how can we workaround these IPRs from base protocol? 
> 
> Regards,
> Ajoy 
> 
> 
> All,
> The consensus call for WG document adoption for the PMIPv6 
> protocol has concluded. Based on all the responses received, 
> it appears that we have rough consensus to adopt 
> draft-sgundave-mip6-proxymip6 as the baseline for a WG 
> protocol document. Please note that this only means that we 
> will use that document as a starting point and the document 
> must reflect WG consensus on all points discussed until now or later. 
> 
> There is a separate question of whether the WG is interested 
> in standardizing the approach of anchoring the MAG 
> functionality as well. I will send out a separate email 
> seeking input on that. I will also send an update on the open 
> issues that we discussed in Prague.  
> 
> As a reminder, the WG will have an opportunity to review the 
> position once we have heard about the IPR situation from all 
> the parties concerned. The current IPR status is still the 
> same as presented at the Prague meeting (Please see Slide 5 
> of http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07mar/slides/netlmm-0.pdf 
> for reference). 
> 
> Thanks,
> Vidya
> 

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm