RE: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG Document Adoption

"Singh Ajoy-ASINGH1" <ASINGH1@motorola.com> Sat, 07 April 2007 02:30 UTC

Return-path: <netlmm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ha0hd-0002T3-PI; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:30:57 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ha0hc-0002Sy-FT for netlmm@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:30:56 -0400
Received: from mail128.messagelabs.com ([216.82.250.131]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ha0hb-0004rz-2u for netlmm@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:30:56 -0400
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: ASINGH1@motorola.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-128.messagelabs.com!1175913049!6734550!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.10.7.1; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [129.188.136.8]
Received: (qmail 17659 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2007 02:30:50 -0000
Received: from motgate8.mot.com (HELO motgate8.mot.com) (129.188.136.8) by server-8.tower-128.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2007 02:30:50 -0000
Received: from il06exr03.mot.com (il06exr03.mot.com [129.188.137.133]) by motgate8.mot.com (8.12.11/Motorola) with ESMTP id l372UnPq022824 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 19:30:49 -0700 (MST)
Received: from il06vts03.mot.com (il06vts03.mot.com [129.188.137.143]) by il06exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id l372UnSw006334 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 21:30:49 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from de01exm71.ds.mot.com (de01exm71.am.mot.com [10.176.8.27]) by il06exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l372UmYo006331 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 21:30:49 -0500 (CDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG Document Adoption
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:30:46 -0400
Message-ID: <B0E7E3680CE6D34D9143AAA7604645380195B33C@de01exm71.ds.mot.com>
In-Reply-To: <C24CB51D5AA800449982D9BCB903251357570E@NAEX13.na.qualcomm.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG Document Adoption
Thread-Index: Acd3lkcsuSIMnlXZR+ej5LxtWrFF7QBI6MyA
From: Singh Ajoy-ASINGH1 <ASINGH1@motorola.com>
To: "Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyan@qualcomm.com>, netlmm@ietf.org
X-Vontu: Pass
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca
Cc:
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org

Vidya, 

Thanks for summarizing the consensus. I think several folks already
showed interested about PMIP anchoring approach. 
So, I am positive that there is enough consensus already in place for
this as well. It will be good idea to expedite 
PMIP anchoring standardization so that folks will have opportunity to
discuss this idea and better 
understand advantages and usecase of this approach.  
I request folks to go through
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07mar/slides/netlmm-1.pdf
to see advantage of PMIP anchoring approach.   

Regards,
Ajoy 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Narayanan, Vidya [mailto:vidyan@qualcomm.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 10:23 AM
To: netlmm@ietf.org
Subject: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG Document Adoption


All,
The consensus call for WG document adoption for the PMIPv6 protocol has
concluded. Based on all the responses received, it appears that we have
rough consensus to adopt draft-sgundave-mip6-proxymip6 as the baseline
for a WG protocol document. Please note that this only means that we
will use that document as a starting point and the document must reflect
WG consensus on all points discussed until now or later. 

There is a separate question of whether the WG is interested in
standardizing the approach of anchoring the MAG functionality as well. I
will send out a separate email seeking input on that. I will also send
an update on the open issues that we discussed in Prague.  

As a reminder, the WG will have an opportunity to review the position
once we have heard about the IPR situation from all the parties
concerned. The current IPR status is still the same as presented at the
Prague meeting (Please see Slide 5 of
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07mar/slides/netlmm-0.pdf for
reference). 

Thanks,
Vidya

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm