Re: [netlmm] Conclusion of Consensus Call on WG Document Adoption

Hello,

Shall we go ahead and submit draft-sgundave-mip6-proxymip6 as Rev0 of the WG
document (draft-netlmm-proxymip6-00)?

-Raj

On 4/5/07 10:22 AM, "ext Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyan@qualcomm.com> wrote:

> 
> All,
> The consensus call for WG document adoption for the PMIPv6 protocol has
> concluded. Based on all the responses received, it appears that we have
> rough consensus to adopt draft-sgundave-mip6-proxymip6 as the baseline
> for a WG protocol document. Please note that this only means that we
> will use that document as a starting point and the document must reflect
> WG consensus on all points discussed until now or later.
> 
> There is a separate question of whether the WG is interested in
> standardizing the approach of anchoring the MAG functionality as well. I
> will send out a separate email seeking input on that. I will also send
> an update on the open issues that we discussed in Prague.
> 
> As a reminder, the WG will have an opportunity to review the position
> once we have heard about the IPR situation from all the parties
> concerned. The current IPR status is still the same as presented at the
> Prague meeting (Please see Slide 5 of
> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07mar/slides/netlmm-0.pdf for
> reference). 
> 
> Thanks,
> Vidya
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netlmm mailing list
> netlmm@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm