Re: [netlmm] Review of LMA Discovery document

Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> Mon, 10 May 2010 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130B43A6C51 for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2010 15:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.033, BAYES_50=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ajOBIt6s4jdN for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2010 15:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.15.174]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DB513A6C3C for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 May 2010 15:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9903 invoked by uid 60001); 10 May 2010 22:25:33 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1273530333; bh=eQ9fZ9QpKi/0QPciot1nNYh/Y0zpUbLxXRdi9ceZm3g=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=eeSn59A+Q0+4g/y01Nx32sMJiJupp1VZ6Qj3lZO12b3jRgaCYnME78ig8uRHUrGv7RQNU4awimsRaxtPcatFYYD3qNBcCOgMxL3v7Ymxe0v6TaNF4ds/VfUT4LdV67ZN/k3A7f3+PH/RGSU6l0dptBWYq2V5oDMWKCcAfm2HDpI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=npzgkcJY2/8e18XCxLT/LFGtB78Q9Qngm/d0mlFDgpR8aVz2WYYMBO3Z39AVK4ayAnZEbYi63LhDFndc8GQ9+GAif6nGNpx43c2KsaudVOVwKKwY5ITFbkQzQ8H/EjOT5/g9v0ACt7ajykuQFIvM6GCJlKJwM680QZb02UYFLMs=;
Message-ID: <780821.9390.qm@web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: 0KPXRbkVM1nTl4FwrKyYV3Jnju8jBfMJOsfwC8K7iXvYLx_ Y8SWPgPgsNiIPWA74HI7RhDUIg3NW_OTrwbk_gjC1Nl48UQc1xri7_g_T5dX 3ugG_BDqrT_HqM19HRcJq1KatT3hvmxabTd_G5bt4SgntOLchK6qrwQufQjW GFWUiP3onl50POHSSWzJN8AUxO4eD3bZUtDxvo6M4srGnIeQPEJRyCTtdpWD aUfQrCqooQRnTeyBD9q9yaIfLwcQIDEs8S866aXCwTh3gzvIroNY2uicZWoS 5OsLq0Gdzg6tZE0wecBTg4HTBxTx282JtTGM7sEMmiHDzIHgUkf5OrzvSIQc F3WRc2M0vhb1i
Received: from [206.16.17.212] by web111408.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 10 May 2010 15:25:33 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/374.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.103.269680
References: <C808B25A.AF375%Jonne.Soininen@nsn.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 15:25:33 -0700
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
To: "Soininen, Jonne (NSN-FI/Espoo)" <Jonne.Soininen@nsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <C808B25A.AF375%Jonne.Soininen@nsn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "netlmm@ietf.org" <netlmm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netlmm] Review of LMA Discovery document
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 22:26:22 -0000

Hi Jonne,
  It is rather strange that we sometimes forget the past.

Here, as an example, about a year ago this message has been posted on netlmm list:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netlmm/current/msg06132.html

which suggested merging the drafts. 

 At your speed, I bet you next year this time, we are gonna be discussing the same things and each side arguing the same way 
J
 
while there is such a simple way out.
 
Behcet


________________________________
Hi,

There is no reason to add this document as a reference as it is currently
not going anywhere. It is not part of any charter and not on an individual
track either. Thus, it cannot be a reference.


On 5/5/10 9:35 PM, "ext Behcet Sarikaya" <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Raj, the right solution is to merge the two drafts.
> What is the point of talking about caching issues of DNS based LMA discovery
> without giving a solution?