Re: [netlmm] Review of LMA Discovery document

Hi,

There is no reason to add this document as a reference as it is currently
not going anywhere. It is not part of any charter and not on an individual
track either. Thus, it cannot be a reference.

On 5/5/10 9:35 PM, "ext Behcet Sarikaya" <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Raj, the right solution is to merge the two drafts.
> What is the point of talking about caching issues of DNS based LMA discovery
> without giving a solution?

You don't merge drafts at this point. The other one is a WG draft, and if
the WG wishes to add something to that draft it is just added to that draft.
However, there needs to be some support to do that.

Cheers,

Jonne.

> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: "Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com" <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
>> To: christian.vogt@ericsson.com; sarikaya@ieee.org
>> Cc: netlmm@ietf.org; jounikor@gmail.com
>> Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 1:03:11 PM
>> Subject: Re: [netlmm] Review of LMA Discovery document
>> 
>> 
> Why normative?
> You can put it as an Informative
>> reference.
> 
> -Raj
> 
> 
> On 5/5/10 12:33 PM, "ext Christian Vogt"
>> <> href="mailto:christian.vogt@ericsson.com">christian.vogt@ericsson.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On May 5, 2010, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>> Does this make sense?
>>> 
>>> Only if Jouni 
>> adds a normative reference to where this is described, i.e.
>>> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sarikaya-netlmm-lma-dnsdiscovery-03.txt
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I am sure Jouni will be able to do this.
>> 
>> - 
>> Christian
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> netlmm mailing 
>> list
>>> href="mailto:netlmm@ietf.org">netlmm@ietf.org
>>> href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm" target=_blank
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> netlmm mailing list
> netlmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm