Re: [netlmm] Review of LMA Discovery document

["Soininen, Jonne (NSN-FI/Espoo)" <[e-mail]>]

Frank,

The issue seems to be really between you and us chairs. It seems that the
rest of the WG is not interested. If you have a complaint about our
behavior, please, address our AD, who is in the cc-field.

Please, take this off-line now. I think we (the chairs) have made our
assessment of the situation.

Cheers,

Jonne.


On 5/12/10 5:37 PM, "ext Frank Xia" <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Vidya
> 
> IMHO, "endlessly discussing "only means
> a small tug-of-war between chairs and us.
> 
> You push this topic without pay enough
> attention on technical issues.
> 
> BR
> Frank
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> Narayanan, Vidya
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:36 AM
> To: Behcet Sarikaya; Soininen, Jonne (NSN-FI/Espoo)
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [netlmm] Review of LMA Discovery document
> 
> Behcet,
> We've discussed this topic enough and it's time to move on. As Jonne said,
> there is a WG document and if there is sufficient consensus, things can be
> added/changed there.  However, there isn't sufficient consensus to add what
> you are asking.  Hence, we need to move on instead of endlessly discussing
> this.  
> 
> Thanks,
> Vidya
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> Behcet Sarikaya
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 3:26 PM
> To: Soininen, Jonne (NSN-FI/Espoo)
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [netlmm] Review of LMA Discovery document
> 
> Hi Jonne,
>   It is rather strange that we sometimes forget the past.
> 
> Here, as an example, about a year ago this message has been posted on netlmm
> list:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netlmm/current/msg06132.html
> 
> which suggested merging the drafts. 
> 
>  At your speed, I bet you next year this time, we are gonna be discussing
> the same things and each side arguing the same way
> J
>  
> while there is such a simple way out.
>  
> Behcet
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> Hi,
> 
> There is no reason to add this document as a reference as it is currently
> not going anywhere. It is not part of any charter and not on an individual
> track either. Thus, it cannot be a reference.
> 
> 
> On 5/5/10 9:35 PM, "ext Behcet Sarikaya" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> Raj, the right solution is to merge the two drafts.
>> What is the point of talking about caching issues of DNS based LMA
> discovery
>> without giving a solution?
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> netlmm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
> _______________________________________________
> netlmm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
>