[netlmm] (no subject)

Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com> Mon, 06 August 2007 13:34 UTC

Return-path: <netlmm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1II2jE-0000tM-0R; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 09:34:36 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1II2jB-0000sw-GR for netlmm@ietf.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 09:34:33 -0400
Received: from n2.nomadiclab.com ([193.234.219.2]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1II2jA-0006d2-Ch for netlmm@ietf.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 09:34:32 -0400
Received: from n2.nomadiclab.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n2.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC89F212D85; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:34:31 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n2.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B92212D83; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:34:31 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <46B72367.2010600@nomadiclab.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:34:31 +0300
From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20070604 Thunderbird/1.5.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: NetLMM Mailing List <netlmm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Cc:
Subject: [netlmm] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org

Everybody,

I have closed the following issues in the tracker, according to the
changes from version 00 to version 01 of the P-MIPv6 base specification
and recent mailing list discussions:

  #149
  #150
  #151
  #153
  #154
  #158
  #156
  #161
  #162
  #163
  #164

Issue #157 (on editorial quality) remains open due to Sri's comment
during the NETLMM session that one more iteration will be needed --
although I think there has already been some substantial improvement in
version 01.

Issue #160 (Timestamps vs. Sequence Numbers) will also get solved with
the next version of the base specification.  Noted this in the tracker.

- Christian

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm