Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Sun, 17 March 2019 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A65128AFB for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52_KxIytXhg3 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1834A1240D3 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id i17so192498pfo.6 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=iRrO8knAQIMkoneapVnec2nSzoqFLhXIX1aPSYdxC+A=; b=JZHhPtISWrriSljWgVWwWteD0+FE09lozvKWfTvC4nICeFhRfxrMzdtzwqq03aAHpm mgdNEKRHciQdjWMu9wDK84NRNfWa5i7ttc53109P7WXP8K0O9yiSsxjC0ytfpXlsvw0n /914kvhUaeuAb+Cxrq5KMbP3RDlPUjK1YC5fGlsyiTZOFFB4+UNinaBEfvNZx0i/updE TY6Za4xXA6Cp9hDowksBU7dra1j+ML+kR2eSH8/sUw2PJuDJoj9/JPfQl7jRT77+Cr3h DchgWHYDPhvSAztV5mVu3pOsMFnBHo2QhwHKb/KvPSz9pDwKaGmIrZFn7/8E2YX+D6H2 Q1iw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=iRrO8knAQIMkoneapVnec2nSzoqFLhXIX1aPSYdxC+A=; b=oII+IlDW5ssxo/hcGdfgWFL6RBXzAn/L+qBek1xlYUGPrs6oMNVBxV/2fgmD9L3AVM uUYW7H8kZ55MpvNT36QBeFxIL+x7s2KBRYXC6xdJnkNojTp7Y8xa/Lj2UGh7dauHpKeq xo76lnpc4g0hWCpPCK65IjMhgzkJiKb7Cg6+szCze/n1ZYDmVKey9yLNpXN4ZoI/xMvV UqdMDnvNgY0mCIPo94roHxjBBjXx9IRNsDUywH9JgUP9pboQ3MjkvK1tzU2tN+ZZ6W2q GQdb9QNZyWqIw9AY78vSjchPqHVnd5yT05YH0SFC169dBB7OfoyGnJMdHoEheaPOzJBd hrsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWM3glSY9lGc9jNjmOjqbQfOopDmj/bEkm8K5n6GCY+uQoFjBVH PKEjJzCoRoexFoS+lFz532+WqARt/zY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwoM9Ou/oJf8Nqsxh2DoflFy1ow43j/dnHF2xowfXUsP+bUeD5t6n5G3XTx8Jl25l8oHi5xIQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a98c:: with SMTP id bh12mr2098806plb.289.1552865399268; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4700:1280:ed56:cee2:ec93:cf83? ([2601:647:4700:1280:ed56:cee2:ec93:cf83]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c130sm14071175pfb.145.2019.03.17.16.29.56 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_00E470D9-8B87-419B-83ED-22C1C396F85A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:39:29 -0700
References: <0100016978b80dcd-31f317a5-443b-400a-98b3-2bfc91841bdc-000000@email.amazonses.com> <C22DBA1F-6683-4035-81EE-6C8754FA9193@cisco.com>
To: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <C22DBA1F-6683-4035-81EE-6C8754FA9193@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <99826DF9-84F5-4F60-8890-972CB30BF8CE@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod-ver-dt/8VRzaq9901GH2HuaMigxXh4ExK8>
Subject: Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02
X-BeenThere: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NetMod WG YANG Model Versioning Design Team <netmod-ver-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod-ver-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 23:30:03 -0000

I wanted to respond to the call for support of the document, but as contributor have always wondered whether it makes sense. As chair I have always put lesser weightage to contributors responding to calls for support of the document. After all we would not be working on the document if we did not like the idea of publishing it.

Based on the responses we have received (which by the way is all from contributors), I wonder if we need to get support from the larger community on the draft.

Just my 2 cents.

> On Mar 17, 2019, at 2:23 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> As contributor, I support adoption of this document by the WG.
>  
> Regards,
> Reshad.
>  
> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>>
> Date: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 4:22 PM
> To: "netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>" <netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>>
> Subject: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02
>  
> Seeing as how we all need to read this draft anyways, in preparation for our meeting in Prague, it seems like a good time for this poll.  Thusly, this email begins a 1-week adoption poll for:
>  
>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-verdt-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-02 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-verdt-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-02>
>  
> Please voice your support or objections before March 20.
>  
> Note that this draft defines *requirements* and its intended status is "Informational."   I believe that it is good for WGs to formalize requirements, even taking such drafts thru Last Call, in order to ensure consensus on the requirements.  This is the "adoption" call, to ascertain if the WG agrees with that statement; if adopted, a separate "last call" will be issued to ensure to correctness of the draft's content.
>  
> Kent (and Lou and Joel)
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>