IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 18 March 2019 08:14 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFD412796D for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1n7HrKqjLHIr for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AC9812788C for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17285; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1552896880; x=1554106480; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=AhnCIUlk9RHAvP5wMWjmN+ZmOpPmQf5X8ot49tryo6M=; b=fL3mr5Ai7TmhdKycDGml3VFxua5qxGbDuexuHYh7ZeF5O0DctTPJibjn aHp3lfhvh5YWIxekHiboxO29U/ZbNUyOYYEzJMbNRP5rXilK6nKNemxBP Kwv5VnoqdjmQKxci0KeWswR0Nivk80EiDdvVViYqp/s3S2p3y5TKbnDN4 c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AEAADHUo9c/xbLJq1jGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBDoFqcRInjCdfjCItmDEUgWcNGAEKhANGAoR2NAkNAQEDAQEJAQMCbRwMhUoBAQEEAQEbURsLDgMDAQIBJwcnHwkIBgEMBgIBARCDDgGBdQ+rBR+EFQKBEIRbBYEvAYtGgUA/gTiCa4MeAQEDgSsBEgE/FoUrA4pTjU6MNAmHW4QCh0IGGYF8hW+DJSaIIYsHhXiFYodJgUc4ZXEzGggbFTuCbIIWF4hfhUA+AzCMFII+AQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.58,493,1544486400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="10805613"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 18 Mar 2019 08:14:38 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x2I8EbeR007761; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:14:37 GMT
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
References: <0100016978b80dcd-31f317a5-443b-400a-98b3-2bfc91841bdc-000000@email.amazonses.com> <C22DBA1F-6683-4035-81EE-6C8754FA9193@cisco.com> <99826DF9-84F5-4F60-8890-972CB30BF8CE@gmail.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <cb1a6242-05f9-a2dd-828b-3a2ea10147cc@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:14:37 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <99826DF9-84F5-4F60-8890-972CB30BF8CE@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------625994971E5939F2F8FE3C86"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.55.221.36, ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod-ver-dt/wXgkm-TD-BVxEVLgvpTFFw3FZLM>
Subject: Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02
X-BeenThere: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NetMod WG YANG Model Versioning Design Team <netmod-ver-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod-ver-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:14:43 -0000

Mahesh,
> I wanted to respond to the call for support of the document, but as 
> contributor have always wondered whether it makes sense. As chair I 
> have always put lesser weightage to contributors responding to calls 
> for support of the document. After all we would not be working on the 
> document if we did not like the idea of publishing it.
>
> Based on the responses we have received (which by the way is all from 
> contributors), I wonder if we need to get support from the larger 
> community on the draft.
Don't you believe you had enough discussion on this topic on the list 
and during the meetings?
Don't you believe that, if you the WG chairs created a design team, it's 
because there is a problem to be solved?

Regards, Benoit
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
>> On Mar 17, 2019, at 2:23 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) 
>> <rrahman@cisco.com <mailto:rrahman@cisco.com>> wrote:
>>
>> As contributor, I support adoption of this document by the WG.
>> Regards,
>> Reshad.
>> *From:*netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org 
>> <mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Kent Watsen 
>> <kent+ietf@watsen.net <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>>
>> *Date:*Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 4:22 PM
>> *To:*"netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>" <netmod@ietf.org 
>> <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>>
>> *Subject:*[netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02
>> Seeing as how we all need to read this draft anyways, in preparation 
>> for our meeting in Prague, it seems like a good time for this poll. 
>>  Thusly, this email begins a 1-week adoption poll for:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-verdt-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-02
>> Please voice your support or objections before March 20.
>> Note that this draft defines *requirements* and its intended status 
>> is "Informational."   I believe that it is good for WGs to formalize 
>> requirements, even taking such drafts thru Last Call, in order to 
>> ensure consensus on the requirements.  This is the "adoption" call, 
>> to ascertain if the WG agrees with that statement; if adopted, a 
>> separate "last call" will be issued to ensure to correctness of the 
>> draft's content.
>> Kent (and Lou and Joel)
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netmod-ver-dt mailing list
> Netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email