Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02

Hi Benoit,

> On Mar 18, 2019, at 1:14 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Mahesh,
>> I wanted to respond to the call for support of the document, but as contributor have always wondered whether it makes sense. As chair I have always put lesser weightage to contributors responding to calls for support of the document. After all we would not be working on the document if we did not like the idea of publishing it.
>> 
>> Based on the responses we have received (which by the way is all from contributors), I wonder if we need to get support from the larger community on the draft.
> Don't you believe you had enough discussion on this topic on the list and during the meetings?
> Don't you believe that, if you the WG chairs created a design team, it's because there is a problem to be solved?

I think you misunderstand. I am not disagreeing that we got here because the WG wanted us to work on it. But should that support not be reflected by folks other than the contributors to these documents?

> 
> Regards, Benoit
>> 
>> Just my 2 cents.
>> 
>>> On Mar 17, 2019, at 2:23 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> As contributor, I support adoption of this document by the WG.
>>>  
>>> Regards,
>>> Reshad.
>>>  
>>> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
>>> Date: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 4:22 PM
>>> To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
>>> Subject: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02
>>>  
>>> Seeing as how we all need to read this draft anyways, in preparation for our meeting in Prague, it seems like a good time for this poll.  Thusly, this email begins a 1-week adoption poll for:
>>>  
>>>     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-verdt-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-02
>>>  
>>> Please voice your support or objections before March 20.
>>>  
>>> Note that this draft defines *requirements* and its intended status is "Informational."   I believe that it is good for WGs to formalize requirements, even taking such drafts thru Last Call, in order to ensure consensus on the requirements.  This is the "adoption" call, to ascertain if the WG agrees with that statement; if adopted, a separate "last call" will be issued to ensure to correctness of the draft's content.
>>>  
>>> Kent (and Lou and Joel)
>>>  
>>>  
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> netmod@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Netmod-ver-dt mailing list
>> Netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt
> 