Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Hi Mahesh,
> Hi Benoit,
>
> On Mar 18, 2019, at 1:14 AM, Benoit Claise <[e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>> Mahesh,
>>> I wanted to respond to the call for support of the document, but as 
>>> contributor have always wondered whether it makes sense. As chair I 
>>> have always put lesser weightage to contributors responding to calls 
>>> for support of the document. After all we would not be working on 
>>> the document if we did not like the idea of publishing it.
>>>
>>> Based on the responses we have received (which by the way is all 
>>> from contributors), I wonder if we need to get support from the 
>>> larger community on the draft.
>> Don't you believe you had enough discussion on this topic on the list 
>> and during the meetings?
>> Don't you believe that, if you the WG chairs created a design team, 
>> it's because there is a problem to be solved?
>
> I think you misunderstand. I am not disagreeing that we got here 
> because the WG wanted us to work on it. But should that support not be 
> reflected by folks other than the contributors to these documents?
I think you misunderstand my point: Let's get things done instead of 
adding process!

Regards, Benoit
>
>>
>> Regards, Benoit
>>>
>>> Just my 2 cents.
>>>
>>>> On Mar 17, 2019, at 2:23 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) 
>>>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> As contributor, I support adoption of this document by the WG.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Reshad.
>>>> *From:*netmod <[e-mail] 
>>>> <mailto:[e-mail]>> on behalf of Kent Watsen 
>>>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>>> *Date:*Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 4:22 PM
>>>> *To:*"[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail] 
>>>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>>> *Subject:*[netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02
>>>> Seeing as how we all need to read this draft anyways, in 
>>>> preparation for our meeting in Prague, it seems like a good time 
>>>> for this poll.  Thusly, this email begins a 1-week adoption poll for:
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-verdt-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-02
>>>> Please voice your support or objections before March 20.
>>>> Note that this draft defines *requirements* and its intended status 
>>>> is "Informational."   I believe that it is good for WGs to 
>>>> formalize requirements, even taking such drafts thru Last Call, in 
>>>> order to ensure consensus on the requirements.  This is the 
>>>> "adoption" call, to ascertain if the WG agrees with that statement; 
>>>> if adopted, a separate "last call" will be issued to ensure to 
>>>> correctness of the draft's content.
>>>> Kent (and Lou and Joel)
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> netmod mailing list
>>>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Netmod-ver-dt mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt
>>