Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-00.txt

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Sun, 24 March 2013 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FBF21F8AB8 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 02:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.174
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.174 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dH-rOJbGufIE for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 02:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD4D21F89FB for <netmod@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 02:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.46]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3750A20BEC; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:21:04 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zo4g7N3NXTEm; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:21:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61AB20BEA; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:21:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 03686252DAAE; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:21:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:21:07 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
Message-ID: <20130324092107.GA19518@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <514C93E9.8@cisco.com> <m2obebl34w.fsf@nic.cz> <20130322210354.GA16103@elstar.local> <514CDAE7.401@cisco.com> <CA22DC74-281B-4EAF-A7E4-8DD0E94C4176@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA22DC74-281B-4EAF-A7E4-8DD0E94C4176@nic.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:21:06 -0000

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 02:00:19PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> 
> OK, but I wonder - do we have any strategy for correcting mistakes
> in our modules? They will be typically revealed only after a module
> is put under stress and used in advanced data models. If breaking
> compatibility is a no go, then we are pretty much stuck.

YANG has specific rules how to make changes. This is what we follow.
In this particular case, I do not at all agree with you that there
is a mistake to correct.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>