[netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-00.txt

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Juergen, NETMOD participants,

Two comments

1.
For the ip-address-no-zone, ipv4-address-no-zone, and 
ipv6-address-no-zone, don't you need a reference to the zone information 
in the description?

      description
         "The ip-address-no-zone type represents an IP address without
          zone information in an IP version neutral way.  The format
          of the textual representations implies the IP version.";

Doesn't give me a pointer to what a zone information is. So I don't know 
what ip-address-no-zone is.
Note: I faced the zone issue only a year ago. Before that, I had no clue 
what it was.


2.
The section "Appendix A. Changes from RFC 6021" is pretty light:

      This version adds new type definitions to the YANG modules. For
    the further details, see the revision statement of the YANG modules.

Take it or leave it. However, I can tell that its resolution will please 
some IESG members, specifically because the rfcdiff tool doesn't do a 
good job of comparing RFC6021 with draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-00.txt

Proposal

      This version adds new type definitions to the YANG modules. The
    first YANG module, ietf-yang-types adds the following new data
    types: yang-identifier, hex-string, uuid, and dotted-quad. The
    second YANG module, ietf-inet-types, adds the following new data
    types: ip-address-no-zone, ipv4-address-no-zone, and
    ipv6-address-no-zone. 

Regards, Benoit (OPS AD)