Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-00.txt

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Mon, 25 March 2013 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3105721F8FE8 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p1Z8cTiTA9oq for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8FC21F8FD7 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius4.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.49]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518A320BE2; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:31:15 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius4.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TeFqXBx-oMCq; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:31:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A5D20BD7; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:31:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 57DC2252F9F0; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:31:19 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:31:19 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: netmod@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20130325143119.GC22576@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: netmod@ietf.org
References: <514C93E9.8@cisco.com> <m2obebl34w.fsf@nic.cz> <20130322210354.GA16103@elstar.local> <514CDAE7.401@cisco.com> <CA22DC74-281B-4EAF-A7E4-8DD0E94C4176@nic.cz> <20130324092107.GA19518@elstar.local> <5162BD50-7673-4BBD-AAD7-A297ABE29906@nic.cz> <20130324190724.GA20421@elstar.local> <m28v5bn4d2.fsf@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m28v5bn4d2.fsf@nic.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:31:17 -0000

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:47:05AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:

> > If something is seriously flawed, it can be deprecated or even made
> > historic and you start a second attempt. All this is possible.
> 
> This all too heavy-weight, so we shall be forced to various kludges
> and workarounds instead, and the elegance and readability of the
> modules will suffer from this cruft. The *-no-zone types are an
> example.

This is how the IETF works. We care about interoperability and hence
changing the semantics of published definitions is a no go.

And once again, I strongly disagree with your notion that *-no-zone
types are 'kludges'.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>