Re: [netmod] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-06.txt> (YANG Module Classification) to Informational RFC

I have no substantive comments, but have noticed, among other things, a few somewhat inconsequential typos that could nevertheless impact readability, particularly for those for whom English is a second language:
• Page 3, penultimate bullet: s/by network operator/by a network operator
• Why is figure 1 on page 5 when it is first referenced at the top of page 4?
• Section 2.1, second paragraph (2 typos): s/peole or extarnal/people or external
• Section 2.1, last paragraph: I don't understand the second sentence that starts: “Although it provides information …”
• Section 2.2, second paragraph: i don't understand the first sentence that starts: “Although the [RFC7950], [RFC7950] …”
• Section 3.3, second paragraph: s/include ability/include the ability
• Section 6: small point but I believe the second acknowledgement should be me(!), “Jonathan Hansford”, not “David”

Jonathan

=O)

On 1 May 2017, 03:32 +0100, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from the NETCONF Data Modeling Language
> WG (netmod) to consider the following document:
> - 'YANG Module Classification'
> <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-06.txt> as Informational
> RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-05-14. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
> The YANG data modeling language is currently being considered for a
> wide variety of applications throughout the networking industry at
> large. Many standards-defining organizations (SDOs), open source
> software projects, vendors and users are using YANG to develop and
> publish YANG modules for a wide variety of applications. At the same
> time, there is currently no well-known terminology to categorize
> various types of YANG modules.
>
> A consistent terminology would help with the categorization of YANG
> modules, assist in the analysis of the YANG data modeling efforts in
> the IETF and other organizations, and bring clarity to the YANG-
> related discussions between the different groups.
>
> This document describes a set of concepts and associated terms to
> support consistent classification of YANG modules.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod