Re: [netmod] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-06.txt> (YANG Module Classification) to Informational RFC

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 01 May 2017 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CD61286B1; Mon, 1 May 2017 04:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a6LV5uxYJrs0; Mon, 1 May 2017 04:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73D85124BFA; Mon, 1 May 2017 04:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v41BFwS3012338; Mon, 1 May 2017 12:15:58 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (xeams.riffcube.co.uk [188.246.205.89]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v41BFqS6012301 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 1 May 2017 12:15:55 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org, warren@kumari.net, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
References: <149360589744.9906.9498469901914786081.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <149360589744.9906.9498469901914786081.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 12:15:46 +0100
Message-ID: <009f01d2c26c$4d733ca0$e859b5e0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIDb54VphIAoa/Moaa5Fy8079WHh6F99QaQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.1.0.1062-23042.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--28.113-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--28.113-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: C/snMIRQLS1fsB4HYR80ZggKAWhuC2ojb6bRSg4rpzsifM7JMNHW6wLy tDvV39h+ODYCThDek8N/zL5S7kM+hC4rw5gWcmxP+mHRL3uzOiKeimGtNywjttp1biJhIyNRXa2 +zE1cP+W4C2CZooc2fxsHDLcsSEIj1RbX+21X57Ogx+na8dyT1TtSuYjPEOigyL0CMroLynWrSt WuvqILVNInOZzevFRlfyi2iaH+RVvoZURPehMJ0i/MZ1E/Ptpx8GRhP/nTHNYsugxReYWqZqHZ5 NtLmicGLUwfBRI7MK94bFH7fUFhlDzemDCU+QwmSEQN/D/3cG6sKrCNemuWXi+Z/NhcdOmxW9mH 5DAsbhdUYj2YBex0VT6GA+hFKox/cqx1y4k8YIeEkZYbtr2mLfioIsi7Sa0gauHKE5Laxl8Pu/0 Lj0myK5b/mTnkM/SIHDnwvr6B+jQYB2fOueQzjzl/1fD/GopdyJ1gFgOMhOm2s0ar5ZAS9Ku6xV HLhqfxrFldG3ZH+DkEkwvLesmd5A==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/AM8VchaBiGJyvvxwUBzObkD3oPc>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-06.txt> (YANG Module Classification) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 11:18:30 -0000

Hi,

I've been reading, reviewing, and discussing this document for a number of
revisions. Of special concern was the relationship to RFC 8049 and
draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained.

The last two revisions have captured the essence of these discussions, and I am
happy with the document as it stands. I think it should be published as an
Informational RFC.

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of The IESG
> Sent: 01 May 2017 03:32
> To: IETF-Announce
> Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org; warren@kumari.net; draft-ietf-netmod-yang-
> model-classification@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: [netmod] Last Call:
<draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-06.txt>
> (YANG Module Classification) to Informational RFC
> 
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the NETCONF Data Modeling Language
> WG (netmod) to consider the following document:
> - 'YANG Module Classification'
>   <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-06.txt> as Informational
> RFC
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-05-14. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Abstract
> 
> 
>    The YANG data modeling language is currently being considered for a
>    wide variety of applications throughout the networking industry at
>    large.  Many standards-defining organizations (SDOs), open source
>    software projects, vendors and users are using YANG to develop and
>    publish YANG modules for a wide variety of applications.  At the same
>    time, there is currently no well-known terminology to categorize
>    various types of YANG modules.
> 
>    A consistent terminology would help with the categorization of YANG
>    modules, assist in the analysis of the YANG data modeling efforts in
>    the IETF and other organizations, and bring clarity to the YANG-
>    related discussions between the different groups.
> 
>    This document describes a set of concepts and associated terms to
>    support consistent classification of YANG modules.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-
> classification/ballot/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod