Re: [netmod] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-06.txt> (YANG Module Classification) to Informational RFC

Thanks for updating, the changes in (v-06)sounds great.
I support the publication of this document.

-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Adrian Farrel
发送时间: 2017年5月1日 19:16
收件人: ietf@ietf.org
抄送: netmod-chairs@ietf.org; warren@kumari.net; draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
主题: Re: [netmod] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-06.txt> (YANG Module Classification) to Informational RFC

Hi,

I've been reading, reviewing, and discussing this document for a number of revisions. Of special concern was the relationship to RFC 8049 and draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained.

The last two revisions have captured the essence of these discussions, and I am happy with the document as it stands. I think it should be published as an Informational RFC.

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of The IESG
> Sent: 01 May 2017 03:32
> To: IETF-Announce
> Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org; warren@kumari.net; draft-ietf-netmod-yang- 
> model-classification@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: [netmod] Last Call:
<draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-06.txt>
> (YANG Module Classification) to Informational RFC
> 
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the NETCONF Data Modeling 
> Language WG (netmod) to consider the following document:
> - 'YANG Module Classification'
>   <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-06.txt> as 
> Informational RFC
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits 
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the 
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-05-14. Exceptionally, comments may 
> be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the 
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Abstract
> 
> 
>    The YANG data modeling language is currently being considered for a
>    wide variety of applications throughout the networking industry at
>    large.  Many standards-defining organizations (SDOs), open source
>    software projects, vendors and users are using YANG to develop and
>    publish YANG modules for a wide variety of applications.  At the same
>    time, there is currently no well-known terminology to categorize
>    various types of YANG modules.
> 
>    A consistent terminology would help with the categorization of YANG
>    modules, assist in the analysis of the YANG data modeling efforts in
>    the IETF and other organizations, and bring clarity to the YANG-
>    related discussions between the different groups.
> 
>    This document describes a set of concepts and associated terms to
>    support consistent classification of YANG modules.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classifi
> cation/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-
> classification/ballot/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod