IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-markup-00

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Thu, 13 April 2017 07:21 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC0C12EBA7; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u1oFLcDQp1Ia; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E97412EBA6; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:718:1a02:1:30ce:c9fd:d5db:548a] (unknown [IPv6:2001:718:1a02:1:30ce:c9fd:d5db:548a]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9251263679; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:21:27 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1492068087; bh=MPT+8NOpu2U1FgLTZSb+ilBXUrT6DX7B6SyQipHTl9M=; h=From:Date:To; b=OdQx+OIvOqt6eMw51H1jkj5dJyYNlFIm1Xk7bpTvlQZPr5iGEt0mnwUBFHPPb2MHN Mg6BttZdfAXMj+C5iAMWKNq7YvcVa0BEQ6SUk3L1vlfW8l6b9qfrZbTmBbrCu5vakZ m94i1htglo4HM8My2oCG0lSWD/YKhoUnyQbAKP00=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20170413071421.GA85949@elstar.local>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:21:27 +0200
Cc: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3768EA5B-2691-4854-A8F7-5C07410956E2@nic.cz>
References: <m2d1ck1o5q.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz> <80e51c0a-9463-8ebe-c35d-9f1fae8c07e9@cisco.com> <m28tn5u6rv.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz> <20170412130207.GA83817@elstar.local> <CABCOCHQ4g6RZc=Jj0zqEu8Sydo8HHOHpfMMFFX7JRCnUAnvm6A@mail.gmail.com> <CA4996D7-B3DB-4A65-8374-3AD98EEA9C73@nic.cz> <CABCOCHRdE8kvq6qxGir9R-weNz90jfS1xoq2nWLGG8JZo2aD1w@mail.gmail.com> <437C6A56-6273-4E37-AAE1-90E01589C1CE@nic.cz> <20170413062230.GA85844@elstar.local> <584A7D9B-3D6D-4B66-A81B-203E7AF31AD3@nic.cz> <20170413071421.GA85949@elstar.local>
To: Jürgen Schönwälder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/E1Q_dDPvMhnosMzRb3ZG7UoQPjA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-markup-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:21:34 -0000

> On 13 Apr 2017, at 09:14, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:28:08AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> 
>> We are talking past each other. Are you willing to admit that my draft has nothing to do with the *presence* of markup in a description text, as long as it remains a valid YANG string?
>> 
> 
> I think you do not understand what I am saying. The main purpose of
> description statements etc. is that they are easily to read by humans.
> 
> 7.21.3.  The "description" Statement
> 
>   The "description" statement takes as an argument a string that
>   contains a human-readable textual description of this definition.
> 
> I disagree with your claim that human-readable text is markup. The
> whole RFC series is formatted human-readable text, not markup. I
> believe this work is heading in the wrong direction, it will lead to
> endless discussions of many different flavors of markup used in
> description clauses, and it will harm interoperability at the human
> eye level.
> 
> I believe there are way more important problems to work on. I am out
> of this thread (since there is more important work to do).

I believe your discussion habits are sometimes aggressive and unacceptable.

Lada

> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email