Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

"Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <> Mon, 06 May 2019 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89A31200E0 for <>; Mon, 6 May 2019 08:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.509
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wj1lTUMgtoxm for <>; Mon, 6 May 2019 08:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3D281201D9 for <>; Mon, 6 May 2019 08:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=25188; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1557155494; x=1558365094; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=GEDSQWxooYUat376mvoi7DsZPiBzt7rPfCcssN+Ls94=; b=KA8S1LQISB/gfK9sE4BxaxER7TNI0h4rDJLyvEdl458tpEthFSkL4Iq3 ttg/XMMpXh9DjyokVZLwYod8UiSzRys0VrOAn0He1cSQ3/dd1OzgUfTnH raBii/Uxykv7GidQMT9ZOIUeefh4qSEics2jQqz1fN7zBNo6lx/2xJUBJ o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,438,1549929600"; d="scan'208,217";a="554396640"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 May 2019 15:11:33 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x46FBXQm011877 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 6 May 2019 15:11:33 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 6 May 2019 10:11:33 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Mon, 6 May 2019 10:11:32 -0500
From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <>
To: Qin Wu <>
CC: Kent Watsen <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02
Thread-Index: AdUEA2FRIxalS4tFStC28aN3YVk9+AARHyeA
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 15:11:32 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EB363D33307A48E7B88608395356BA86ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 15:11:53 -0000

On May 6, 2019, at 08:06, Qin Wu <<>> wrote:

Hi, Chairs:
Sorry for late follow up, thanks Jurgen, Andy,Joe, Joel and all others for good comments, here is the update based on discussion and suggestion on the mailing list
The diff is:

Hey, Qin.  I read through the changes, and I have a couple of additional comments.

First, the term “YANG server” sounds odd to me.  I know what you mean, but I haven’t seen this defined before.  Maybe just saying a device or host is sufficient?

When you talk about the datastore to be reset, you list <running>, <startup>, and <candidate>.  You state that each will receive the contents of <factory-default>.  The <candidate> DS wouldn’t need that.  I think it would just be zeroed out.

I think the RPC should reset any and all non-derived read-write datastores and not imply that a specific DS’s contents (i.e., the factory-default DS) is copied to them.  This way, other DSes would just be handled by this RPC based on implementation.  The <factory-default> can exist as the factory default contents for <startup>.


We believe it is ready for second adoption poll. Thanks!

-Qin (on behalf of authors)
发件人: netmod [] 代表 Kent Watsen
发送时间: 2019年4月9日 2:36
主题: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

This message concludes the adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02   The working group consensus supports working on the problem, but fundamental concerns were raised regarding the solution, specifically around reseting datastores versus resetting devices.  The chairs feel that these issues should be addressed before proceeding with the adoption.

Authors, please update and resubmit the draft addressing the comments received during the adoption poll.  Another adoption poll will be issued when ready.
Thank you,
Kent (and Lou and Joel)

On Mar 25, 2019, at 4:34 PM, Kent Watsen <<>> wrote:

This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:

Please voice your support or objections before April 8.<x-apple-data-detectors://1>

Kent (and Lou)
netmod mailing list<>

netmod mailing list<>