Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8342 (5514)

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Mon, 08 October 2018 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA84A130E55 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OX7NJDoPQWyu for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF2E8130E01 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id u21-v6so18548217lja.8 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 10:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gk8eBgkGBmGvmKm/lVES/iyFc81WWjfSQfBPMNL4Dqk=; b=Ru/chmwrk8mQPOBvy0kiIlYiX7zR1VEWAt4UV+4kCeu0Zx5vNJP6okU5fX5oZHedbB QiFFFpFIvoeSozBKum2Z63TUy24UQ/ceCD1bIkRV1W7S7KvGs0Yr7wRKpmh2iiLazaGx Co+3GuSNN1BVzQIl95GXoq0118QxTDp6WqL69LC+sCYXuF1vH2C71m0vPIOuTAZeOwwG WpUqhIlQhIf9PEMo3364iLp+ICh54pTezPXFly3GtjsuXdizvFXp3w596DKolDkKVlev WaETpj6+mZJ9fqZ4Bu0HzGQsAYHlx1v2nxyW4+zoe6PmmgTKzWzI9+75+6MD7PIBtqA7 kKVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gk8eBgkGBmGvmKm/lVES/iyFc81WWjfSQfBPMNL4Dqk=; b=qhLVY8ZNucqhRMqNKm+RpaseI1ISQrR5VfQlD+2/AapkH4O5vp4LVb9qkGTgPnG+RZ fUNDlHQTXLwQJoVb8BU2PKCEVUlRPMCfFVoxznRZrBc0kTw+QKUixQ6ft/NX/EPyIsj4 b67FIn+S4xtkYTKVLJOujfx1ZtGRSzRC9nSaBlgWeXWrfY+UiIuEcaGpARnQ3EwIpO0b TC7cYXPLlIE4JXBCAaFHtV4nW7+8yjS48SqXlEdveBuALkj0O3pXJVhwHpsn10bCHFPP kyXnfld9EKbhEEps6UGaMUs/26r2en3odP8f/8QDLKdqkeNodT050S8Ds3BmlmKa8Vm2 Xokw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohI9owuCvhjToyAAPc9k52BdIpINjRQnRGKlhP4LORmnQbAEi/u WcZ11SvFWsmRAmFzN2ey3kpCAkMdhnGgeZS/ZY6cHQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63b/vi1+yVTO0aLwCFP1j8kNvk7BxJzTa0KuO/yQgsUDQ7Z6ALBFVMKX9ZP+XyWN3de5INfxqXiGcXF6RNfDiE=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:4408:: with SMTP id r8-v6mr16679945lja.21.1539018979611; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 10:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a19:f811:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <75052af6-665d-f248-7082-c9a0f4f4ab3d@labn.net>
References: <20181005101427.bw7qo7ertxk2dj5d@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <1b34ccac-831f-505d-d40b-c21234efc475@labn.net> <20181005142816.avs2es2ymvc7qxwx@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <2e2f0188-770c-5fad-6a9d-a0be3abd1fce@labn.net> <CABCOCHS4GOVYC0FRJEtCpzQ+VB=u6g0LDEmL1ULqysBA=yhzNg@mail.gmail.com> <20181007064721.i4gfbmhrldvmtgbz@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <CABCOCHTZMabKuu-T4mGAwiaeWDpSWZopFB42W8A+u7g6ZvRg7w@mail.gmail.com> <20181007170907.23ussvtcds7ftnab@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <973c0b2d-cc42-fdc6-d405-dd7e561a37a3@cisco.com> <0073d57d-217d-3fff-54c3-7f0cf062c0cc@labn.net> <20181008141357.pme6q4aw2v66yi4m@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <75052af6-665d-f248-7082-c9a0f4f4ab3d@labn.net>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:16:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHQdo1LXkET4FgJeBEi2MuwboqTHghWO4c+K701+5TFXCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000952fa90577bac795"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/MRO-igrriSxymnnPVvUjBUWSwBA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8342 (5514)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 17:17:17 -0000

On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

>
>
> On 10/8/2018 10:13 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 08:57:33AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote:
>>
>>> I think it's clear that the reviewers, notably myself as shepherd, missed
>>> that this is a lowercase "must" and should have asked for clarification
>>> during the review process.
>>>
>>> Having an errata saying this "must" really is a "MUST" is quite
>>> reasonable
>>> from my perspective.
>>>
>> As explained, technically speaking, the "must" is pointless in certain
>> situations. Making it a MUST does not make things any better.
>>
> Okay - then all that needs to be done is clarify the errata and decide if
> you want to author a new draft on the behavior/text you'd like to change.
>
>

After reading the RFC details, it seems that the example is intentional
based on
the text about NP-containers.

I think an errata could be used because the sentence about a top-level
origin must be defined
could be interpreted to define "top-level" as the topmost level for which
the origin property
is applicable.  It appears the intent was to exclude NP-containers from
this requirement.


Thanks,
> Lou
>

Andy


>
>
>> /js
>>
>>
>